Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-json-i-json-05

Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> Fri, 23 January 2015 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97E81A700D for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:16:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id asmh3zVZ_6iu for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:16:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B5F1A1AE1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:16:18 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f79916d00000623a-9d-54c2311b4922
Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 72.AB.25146.B1132C45; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:31:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [155.53.229.195] (147.117.188.8) by smtp-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.188.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:16:14 -0500
Message-ID: <54C28FEE.6030800@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:16:14 -0800
From: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
Organization: Ericsson AB
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
References: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A33094759@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <CAHBU6isLVe2Wk355MY-gad=RqxJ5GWaGmXGhR8xw5vsh8EC8=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6isLVe2Wk355MY-gad=RqxJ5GWaGmXGhR8xw5vsh8EC8=A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060402040105080107000803"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPlK6M4aEQgxfvGS3+TOxlsrj66jOL xdI/81kcmD2WLPnJ5HFp6WRmjy+XP7MFMEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZWydM42p4FNMxfJzdxgb GM/adTFyckgImEj83fSZHcIWk7hwbz1bFyMXh5DAEUaJK2uOs0I46xkljixfzQpSxSugLXGh uZsRxGYRUJVYMusXM4jNJmAhsf33c7AafgFJiQ0Nu8HiogJhEt8372CG6BWUODnzCQuILSKg LPFp1hZGkAXMAm2MEqcnLWYDSQgLOEl0LO1nhNg8iVGi7fg+sG5OgUCJrmM/wYqYgabOuz4F LC4EdFHH52tsExgFZyFZMgtJGYRtITFz/nlGCFtbYtnC11BxDYnWOXPZkcUXMLKtYuQoLU4t y003MtzECAz7YxJsjjsYF3yyPMQowMGoxMP7oeFgiBBrYllxZe4hRmkOFiVx3rIrQCGB9MSS 1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTBycUg2M6lvll9+9kKnQx2fpHbrpjrtoq31kBnOsUWTevFC/WQzS kSmSnQdvr0r6cyj0cvrq/o9HOLZr3RbNUL8866pE1s/KEA4+l+qvPLuXus+3eGp2SPSCNGOI c8NPz4rETe77zgRoer+4VHzT58yjL0+Nw533TSvekpq9oGtq2W1ZG3MV05g9RouUWIozEg21 mIuKEwE7UAoPXAIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/-UGVmIQ-jtbXC-aWttB6Lkfs-0Q>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-json-i-json.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-json-i-json.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-json-i-json-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:16:21 -0000

Hi Tim,
   thanks for considering, please see inline.

Best Regards,
Meral

On 01/22/2015 06:13 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
> <editor-hat>
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Meral Shirazipour 
> <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com 
> <mailto:meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>
>     Nits/editorial comments:
>
>     -Please spell out acronyms at first use. E.g. JSON, I-JSON
>
>
> ​I disagree.  People know what JSON stands for, and for those who 
> don’t spelling it out wouldn’t help.  De facto, the name of the format 
> is JSON.  Also, the mention of JavaScript is a red herring.​
I agree for JSON, but I-JSON I had to look it up.
>
>     -[Page 3], "treat an integer", it would be good to mention this is
>     still referring to IEEE754 format.
>
>
> ​I disagree.  It’s talking about the sequence of digits in the I-JSON 
> text, irrespective of any binary format.​
was not clear to me, thanks for clarifying.
> ​
>
>     -[Page 3],"(one example would be 64-bit integers)", here not clear
>     if still IEEE7544 is discussed or integer format. If latter, is it
>     signed/unsigned.
>
>     "RECOMMENDED to encode them in JSON string values." should this be
>     done in decimal format then?
>
>
> ​I think this has been discussed elsewhere on teh thread. It’s 
> irritating that 64-bit integers would be string-encoded even though 
> most computers can handle them in hardware, but it is a real plus for 
> interoperability.  Anyhow, the place where this advice really applies 
> is for​ huge crypto integers.
yes, that part of the text was not clear to me. For a standards track 
RFC it may be worth taking another look at it.
>
>     -[Page 4], Section 3, "in the JSON messages it receives."--->"in
>     the JSON messages they receives."
>
>
> ​er, “er, they receive’. Yup.  ​
>
> ​​
>
>     ​​
>     -[Page 4], "receiving implementation"---->"receiving implementations"
>
>
> ​Yup.​
>
> ​​
>
>     Best Regards,
>
>     Meral
>
>     ---
>
>     Meral Shirazipour
>
>     Ericsson
>
>     Research
>
>     www.ericsson.com <http://www.ericsson.com>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> - Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see 
> https://keybase.io/timbray)