Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-option-01
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Mon, 12 November 2012 18:43 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946E521F8790; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:43:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UpIDCMdGwpQR; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:43:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [93.186.182.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967E421F878E; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 10:43:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [186.134.15.187] (helo=[192.168.123.122]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1TXyz3-0001sp-C6; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:43:45 +0100
Message-ID: <50A14350.9070705@si6networks.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:43:28 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Moriarty, Kathleen" <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>
References: <182B306DD37FAD4882AB1C1EBE2CA9020DCDDF9129@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <182B306DD37FAD4882AB1C1EBE2CA9020DCDDF9129@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 11:31:19 -0800
Cc: "draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-option.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-option.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-gont-intarea-obsolete-eid-option-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:43:51 -0000
HI, Kathleen, Thnas so much for your feedback. Please find my responses in-line... On 10/25/2012 05:36 PM, Moriarty, Kathleen wrote: > Summary: The document needs a few small revisions. This document > formally deprecates the IPv6 Endpoint Identification (EID) option > (hex value 0x8a). FWIW, I'll update the title to note that this in an IPv6 option. > Major issues: > > Minor issues: RFC2119 is referenced, but not used. I don't see the > use of any RFC2119 language in the document, so it may be safe to > remove this reference. Will do. > I don't think the reference for EID option is valid. I also looked > at the reference in the IANA page and that no longer contains a link. > From a google search, it looks like this was an internet draft that > was never published as an RFC and expired, > http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/nimrod/eidoption.txt Listing it as "A > work in progress" when it is an expired draft s not appropriate. Ok, I will update this references as indicated. > Nits/editorial comments: > > I recommend changing the following portion of the abstract to state > what is accomplished in this draft as the language is a little > confusing: "possibly serving as a basis for providing advice" Since > this draft doesn't actually provide the advice, just says it may > provide a basis for providing the advice, I would recommend leaving > this out of the abstract. I've already applied such change -- thanks! > Recommend removing "e.g." fromt he last sentence int he Security > Considerations section as it is not needed. Change from: "However, > formally deprecating this option may serve as a basis for e.g. > providing advice about filtering packets containing such option (in a > similar way to [I-D.ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering] for the IPv4 > case)." TO: "However, formally deprecating this option may serve as a > basis for providing advice about filtering packets containing such > option (in a similar way to [I-D.ietf-opsec-ip-options-filtering] for > the IPv4 case)." I've removed such sentence altogether, upon suggestion by Wes Eddy. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-gont-intarea-ob… Moriarty, Kathleen
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-gont-intare… Ronald Bonica
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-gont-intare… Moriarty, Kathleen
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-gont-intare… Fernando Gont