[Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt
Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Mon, 03 August 2009 10:59 UTC
Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00E03A6AFC for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 03:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LEzTykYlXkcV for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 03:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.52.174]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AB9723A6D09 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 03:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 35484 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2009 10:59:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO thunderfish.local) (turners@96.241.2.149 with plain) by smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Aug 2009 10:59:51 -0000
X-Yahoo-SMTP: qPTWNAeswBAtDTSn9GKlmmL3C90ke7grn_5n9To-
X-YMail-OSG: g8sdy6UVM1nlAhq18BLpbMVAxhVJg1_EsGYho09XVARhZEfkgYsaxkzUNLhcsaZXW0.Z2dk6XyZu7gO7yVL9O40onGajxSrirts7zboudGe0AF927qhu5Yc4Ekj1hFWpyM10jHt6EOwiAvg7cuEoXYRpq4VQ0UuxoVbKXs8BBgLAzU4mDH740JfzBS_LcdRt3X2f2xn1NyEG_8O5.T1qH.kjSF7ZB2lauuEHpAULnoI43_uTYUn4sGihM7JcHsKTwWOB7ZdRd9UfnudufprKxDLued9lk1F6pcviVb3WCS.SekUq1nCU52i6hwaarVzzspGBBAUXGpe06u5k4D3l9TyVIkF3kqqZR0lZRu9.Ag--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <4A76C326.9080903@ieca.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 06:59:50 -0400
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org, alto-chairs@tools.ietf.org, alto-ads@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:59:51 -0000
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2008-08-02 IETF LC End Date: 2009-08-04 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. The one question in my mind is whether this should proceed now or remain a living document and become final at the end? Is ALTO going to redo this document if they decide to expand their scope? spt
- [Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-probl… Sean Turner
- Re: [Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-p… Eric Burger