Re: [Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt

Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Mon, 03 August 2009 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFDC3A6D2E for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 04:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DCS5fXVMz2OX for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 04:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gs19.inmotionhosting.com (gs19.inmotionhosting.com [205.134.252.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26F33A6D3E for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 04:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [12.46.252.162] (helo=[172.17.136.184]) by gs19.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1MXwAZ-0004rU-Gu; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 04:57:35 -0700
Message-Id: <30D085A4-98A7-4D1E-997D-FDF07BCF7BB6@standardstrack.com>
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A76C326.9080903@ieca.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-8-410513830"; micalg="sha1"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:57:33 -0400
References: <4A76C326.9080903@ieca.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gs19.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, alto-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement@tools.ietf.org, alto-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:57:35 -0000

Thanks for the review.

Our plan was to publish the problem statement now, but let the  
requirements, which includes the taxonomy, be the living document,  
waiting for the bitter end...

On Aug 3, 2009, at 6:59 AM, Sean Turner wrote:

> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)  
> reviewer
> for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt
> Reviewer: Sean Turner
> Review Date: 2008-08-02
> IETF LC End Date: 2009-08-04
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational  
> RFC.
>
> The one question in my mind is whether this should proceed now or  
> remain a living document and become final at the end?  Is ALTO going  
> to redo this document if they decide to expand their scope?
>
> spt
>
>
>