[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03

Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> Sat, 19 October 2013 05:15 UTC

Return-Path: <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DA821F9FB0 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1I8WtLjY8rJ for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C9A21F9F85 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7fe28e000000d82-55-526215535823
Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 89.DD.03458.45512625; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 07:15:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.90]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 01:14:59 -0400
From: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
To: "draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts.all@tools.ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03
Thread-Index: Ac7MifEfGdiWC7CdRcWtQkYrm0/kPg==
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 05:14:59 +0000
Message-ID: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A2822B1E4@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A2822B1E4eusaamb107erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPlG6IaFKQwZ0VYhZ7Wo8yWlx99ZnF gcljyZKfTB5fLn9mC2CK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4MrouHyHveC8UUXTqbcsDYzLdLoYOTkkBEwk Lp1+wgRhi0lcuLeerYuRi0NI4CijxMO3a6Cc5YwSL74cYwWpYhOwkNj++zkrSEJEYAWjxOcN 7ewgCWGBQIn3p74xdzFyACXCgMbyg4RFBPQketqfsYOEWQRUJe61GYOEeQV8Jd6e3M8MYjMC Lf5+ag3YEcwC4hK3nsyHOkhAYsme88wQtqjEy8f/WCFsZYnvcx6xQNTnSxy+eIsRYqagxMmZ T1gmMArNQjJqFpKyWUjKIOI6Egt2f2KDsLUlli18zQxjnznwmAlZfAEj+ypGjtLi1LLcdCPD TYzAaDgmwea4g3HBJ8tDjNIcLErivF/eOgcJCaQnlqRmp6YWpBbFF5XmpBYfYmTi4JRqYKxP Wb31lRbfh3/PSnt5OxuiJt0u862se/67Kvuo1pzvf5fXz1cqtNP6F2PAtap422ehTOHMwvOy B7fMi5T7aJu88d8eNuF8rveHok5vfHqZqcfX9p7YqpmnWMs2lbVUKT3xXX3ke1L9TNfNGZ2y tmkvYxPPxEdfW3d8epXSpzqVWfKfnV7VMCixFGckGmoxFxUnAgCo3rCaVAIAAA==
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 05:15:07 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq  .

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document: draft-hethmon-mcmurray-ftpext-ftp-hosts-03
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2013-10-18
IETF LC End Date: 2013-10-18
IESG Telechat date: 2013-10-24


Summary:
This draft is ready to be published as Standard RFC but I do have some comments.


Nits/editorial comments:
Overall the draft was a bit hard to read but given the long time it has been around I presume it has passed implementers' test when it comes to clarity.
Here are a few comments:
-[Page 1], Asbtract: A sentence is missing between 1st and 2nd sentence: it should say what is the problem with the fact stated in the 1st sentence.
-[Page 5], typo, "accomodate"-->"accommodate"  (two occurrences)
-[Page 11] section 3.2.2. "the the server-PI "----> extra "the"
-[Page 17], Section 3.3 "or otherwise chooses not conform" --> not clear what is not conform
-[Page 18], Section 4, not clear what this sentence means:
"a server implementation
   MUST treat an additional HOST command that was sent before a user has
   been authenticated as though a previous HOST command was not sent.
"

Best Regards,
Meral

---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson
Research
www.ericsson.com