[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-13

Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 02 March 2024 09:50 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, rtgwg@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <170937303360.21897.6374773799198167418@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2024 01:50:33 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/3uEMppwALe-VVm2vJHjgU6XOh5U>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-13

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2024-03-02
IETF LC End Date: 2024-03-05
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: the document is ready for publication as a standard track RTC with nits

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
 1. Noticed that there is an IPR statement for the individual draft. Why there
 is no IPR statement for the WG document?
2. Was there a discussion to have the document as informational or experimental
and not standard track?

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-r… Roni Even via Datatracker
Re: [Gen-art] [EXTERNAL] Genart last call review … Alexander Vainshtein