Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-04.txt
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 03 January 2011 04:05 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BA23A69C2 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 20:05:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.415
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.415 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.184, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5afk7VMUoAk for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 20:05:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D783A697F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 20:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qwg5 with SMTP id 5so13757587qwg.31 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:07:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=V6H5LgApriJs03Caub8jVQi3TTMh7DOuQq3lDPBWz6U=; b=rnYylpInvhbbLsOp0vCUbvv2+g0OAEBkqOfsKPrLlJa66Ykxvm/z8horMTI69oRKsA ABHml7Z3oAMNPli+vw1fpWEVcjrX5h7jsmpruPKrbxypIfRx6tzB7KAHe0xVnyXOV9NU s27eU4W+uvpfzT8huljpGTg18KBR12JyWOpNY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=B6UCADf6X4hdGW98Myu1pd3yOdpDaKZaN9yTn4D5foBFlEJSq/+0NpB6DqPWXtSogu xz2ILToMQ543ZnKoYhxNoTNbDMfKY7BPNtOryw+duZCzJ9H4Hudarvbg+ar5aHz4fQom 8Hd5JkxB2ZYVG5k3aVtuJJN6O4+rMs3gKELaQ=
Received: by 10.229.233.19 with SMTP id jw19mr17825781qcb.24.1294027642611; Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:07:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.1.1.4] ([121.98.190.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id nb15sm10858465qcb.38.2011.01.02.20.07.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 02 Jan 2011 20:07:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D214B76.4010706@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:07:18 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
References: <4D193B16.2010102@gmail.com> <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150E9947CB7@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150E9947CB7@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 04:05:16 -0000
Suresh,
Let's wait and see if the IESG requests any changes. Maybe even one
sentence in the Introduction would be enough to alert the reader to the
recommendations?
Brian
On 2011-01-03 15:29, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> I see your point about the placement of Section 7. Would moving Section 7 much earlier in the document address your concern? If so, I can move it to Section 1.1 or (a new) Section 2. Do you think any more text is needed?
>
> Thanks
> Suresh
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
>> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 8:19 PM
>> To:
>> draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns.all@tools.ietf.org;
>> General Area Review Team
>> Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of
>> draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-04.txt
>>
>> Please see attached review.
>>
>>
>>
>>
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-t… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6o… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6o… Brian E Carpenter