Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-04.txt

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Mon, 03 January 2011 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD8E28C0F1 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 18:27:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ElXGtwvRLR3v for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 18:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D978228C0EB for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 18:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id p0335FUo006312; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 21:05:17 -0600
Received: from EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.66]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Sun, 2 Jan 2011 21:29:43 -0500
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns.all@tools.ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 21:29:39 -0500
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-04.txt
Thread-Index: AcumLUeyYtlJaV0+RVu54hNrcc8p/AEwFcIA
Message-ID: <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150E9947CB7@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <4D193B16.2010102@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D193B16.2010102@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 02:27:49 -0000

Hi Brian,
  I see your point about the placement of Section 7. Would moving Section 7 much earlier in the document address your concern? If so, I can move it to Section 1.1 or (a new) Section 2. Do you think any more text is needed?

Thanks
Suresh


> -----Original Message-----
> From: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 8:19 PM
> To: 
> draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns.all@tools.ietf.org; 
> General Area Review Team
> Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of 
> draft-ietf-v6ops-tunnel-security-concerns-04.txt
> 
> Please see attached review.
> 
> 
> 
>