IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 21 June 2018 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DA51310B4; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:25:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=Bm1Cjs+2; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=N4lT1ap0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P4Bg4Nkx0ACb; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAC7F13109B; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F40821AF5; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:25:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:25:42 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; bh=PTgF06zeHmatPUQqyIlU1FOt3XcZ4D/G823MhphdgIQ=; b=Bm1Cjs+2 e8yPT8geKyWBI9GdKb7GxriNBZQRZEqkE2hbyt954oV0fxbanL5chzBq6v2QWmbl h4OVy7IFioB4uGPIliIxbjILj5oftYE3WmUB+LlbPmOpqAg3sdfohUESOYdljBRQ gOGnmdyVKNVcj9TXzbXL03HueY35mvYTSvuCVhq/BBV+zokMnCc9nrVewsw6xxKR +yzTK5r32r5sOT6pSy5Rrbkye/zIY8NgqEc6gn1y4mWAph+jgw5UhAI2NaeXOPMh CoTYU3bCfq3gcKpCOyxIgcz179D4Ttbp+1OvEo3fveP5Z5laFEilR5GC0yC587lL YDSG8vtAXaBTSQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=PTgF06zeHmatPUQqyIlU1FOt3XcZ4 D/G823MhphdgIQ=; b=N4lT1ap0L6XN6B4EDLuLD0Ltl2+VyMJHWEt2hl1KPk6N8 b4xTwX7zLcFLOOL8G42E70D4DODdFpQGJ4JLcI0s3ADREcM1sYs8zb/OBivm7DSg M01o8utNnB+gestgVAhIlWlVicznenT2HNEdNvD/uhehiP6XcqiwLKr55Yce8Krh AOpEtJvIBVkqbvEI4sRfLuJFSyqte4LO/QwEk/Lyn/IRSx+7gT6eplv4F0n4xbCI dqG8+fmhBHmXJFW5smAARc850G0kKGECeQSOZD7L+CnPFNpbQ63C9QKZlAA6Cmpj iwr0thjkglQg6OZCBz6b6k3TAjYca15hQDUmoAZ4A==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ZrUrW2LEZQLxWqByIt64t-bFrpGt-ZmDvaAZfpVHA-uJVm48RyMmyQ> <xmx:ZrUrWyZGF0i8ssJvyubuzbByjtkfk_eieTZ2TI5TBxMDkgL3rPEmng> <xmx:ZrUrW6T1RzzsloWYM4t0g95J_fFd7BH584X5V8WeAvgxMyJgLls6Ug> <xmx:ZrUrW6j_sFRnO-mbEry-db0RKi1kPIgXOOgqitXc3Xl0sgQAGXvwgw> <xmx:ZrUrW2uakIAwZGIUEGkjxH7Y0ImI9vC52uhe7izf66QxYj4QxdONZg> <xmx:ZrUrW21Ghh1k1cSGH2ImJAHQHHpYo0lyKsiiZr-e9Ork5qSGSCV3Tg>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ZrUrW7Vck_A1iNelPO5Vu5CHrsw7xOYGL7-e_8QKfvXjAxGN1ZB61w>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A0BDBE4BB5; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:25:41 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_07DECB6D-B765-447A-B944-C83F2034E1B3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <d1005839-65cf-78f5-4395-feb93b6cfe5d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:25:41 -0400
Cc: Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw.all@ietf.org, pals@ietf.org, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <25449863-FEAA-45CA-8609-FAE077C257CC@cooperw.in>
References: <152877425096.2652.654313340478370473@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=duU0QiNEnywWor0qzLMwunA4_XaCHOOiOnrAZt_XXadVLEQ@mail.gmail.com> <22883AA3-E923-4294-95AD-9DC1C7E37391@cooperw.in> <d1005839-65cf-78f5-4395-feb93b6cfe5d@gmail.com>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/47fh_GSKijTjmA7b54S1DSkOZlY>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:25:51 -0000

Thanks!

> On Jun 19, 2018, at 5:35 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alissa
> 
> Yes, we will address all review comments that we receive.
> 
> - Stewart
> 
> 
> On 18/06/2018 18:44, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>> Brian, thanks for your review. Andy, thanks for your response; hopefully it means Brian’s comments will be addressed? I have entered a No Objection ballot.
>> 
>> Alissa
>> 
>>> On Jun 12, 2018, at 1:50 PM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com <mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Brian,
>>> 
>>> Thanks, your comments are much appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Andy
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:30 PM, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>>> Review result: Ready with Nits
>>> 
>>> Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06
>>> 
>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>>> like any other last call comments.
>>> 
>>> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>>.
>>> 
>>> Document: draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-06.txt
>>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
>>> Review Date: 2018-06-12
>>> IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-15
>>> IESG Telechat date: 2018-06-21
>>> 
>>> Summary: Ready with nits
>>> --------
>>> 
>>> Comments: 
>>> ---------
>>> 
>>> This (with RFC4928) is a wonderful example of why layer violations are a Bad Thing.
>>> 
>>> Nits:
>>> -----
>>> 
>>> > 1.  Introduction
>>> ....
>>> >   This document recommends the use of the Ethernet pseudowire control
>>> >   word in all but exceptional circumstances.
>>> 
>>> That's wrong, it *mandates* this usage with a MUST (first paragraph of section 4).
>>> 
>>> > 3.  Background
>>> ....
>>> >   A recent posting on the Nanog email list has highlighted this
>>> >   problem:
>>> >
>>> >   https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-December/089395.html <https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2016-December/089395.html>
>>> 
>>> No, it's no longer recent. How about:
>>> 
>>>    For example, a posting on the Nanog email list highlighted this
>>>    problem:
>>> 
>>> > 7.  Operational Considerations
>>> >
>>> >   CW presence on the PW is controlled by the configuration and may be
>>> >   subject to default operational mode of not being enabled. 
>>> 
>>> That sentence is hard to parse. Try this:
>>> 
>>>    A configuration switch might determine whether the CW is used on the PW. 
>>>    The default configuration might be to disable use of the CW.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gen-art mailing list
>>> Gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:Gen-art@ietf.org>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email