Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Sun, 13 July 2008 09:49 UTC
Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760D33A69AE; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7213A6B2B for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.261
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03mmJjUvTnSo for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [91.121.26.85]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968D33A69C9 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6D9nfaX041813; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:49:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <200807130949.m6D9nfaX041813@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: "Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)" <pcalhoun@cisco.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:13:09 PDT. <4FF84B0BC277FF45AA27FE969DD956A20614EBDC@xmb-sjc-235.amer.cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 11:49:41 +0200
Cc: dromasca@avaya.com, gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-option-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
In your previous mail you wrote:
- in TOC and section 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments
<PRC> I think perhaps your version is the queen's english, while mine is
the one accepted in the US :(
=> there is no (not yet?) gen-art review FAQ but if the two spelling
exist the RFC Editor loudly insists to use the one without the 'e'...
Thanks
Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
PS: you should have noted Ralph Droms' comment about v4/v6 option naming.
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-… Francis Dupont
- [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-opti… Francis Dupont
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-… Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-… Scott Brim
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-… Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
- Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-capwap-dhc-ac-… Scott Brim