IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-12

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sun, 11 September 2016 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738FE12B0C0; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:38:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J9iJ43jif9Fi; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFCD128B44; Sat, 10 Sep 2016 23:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469942CCAE; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 09:38:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ScVn61JWOwtj; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 09:38:17 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799F72CC9B; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 09:38:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DCAA7631-4683-417D-ADE0-B900C9C57069"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <6f151dc4-b81f-ecf5-16f4-c63ecfe16471@ericsson.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 09:38:17 +0300
Message-Id: <5C2358E6-0486-42BD-9712-43A956F07192@piuha.net>
References: <MWHPR03MB28639038A6D48CE94C9622FBADEA0@MWHPR03MB2863.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <2b1eb276-6341-70dc-5ce5-5375a0035a93@ericsson.com> <8435a4ad-4094-e065-63bc-7d096f769605@tomh.org> <MWHPR03MB2863EAB99D1EFA1F24AB7C71ADFA0@MWHPR03MB2863.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <13dbd594-d201-be86-a036-741612be48a5@tomh.org> <MWHPR03MB2863F3AB99979F38BF49E21BADFA0@MWHPR03MB2863.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <6f151dc4-b81f-ecf5-16f4-c63ecfe16471@ericsson.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/54OlwJZLxTioPYOC_riKWhD7iIA>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org>, "draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 06:38:22 -0000

I think the wording as it is on -13 is fine. I.e., RFC number but no reference. I wouldn’t necessarily use RFC numbers even in general in abstract, but “This RFC replaces RFC nnnn.” I think is fine and appropriate.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email