IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-lexicography-06

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Sun, 15 January 2006 17:28 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EyBgQ-00062a-I2; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:28:50 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EyBgB-0005zS-7h for gen-art@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:28:35 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07750 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:48:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Exl78-0007LV-Kz for gen-art@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:06:41 -0500
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DECE25970B; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:57:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23550-02; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:57:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.160] (163.80-203-220.nextgentel.com [80.203.220.163]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E81259709; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:57:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:58:36 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, gen-art@ietf.org
Message-ID: <0767D76DD6BC4707AD796BCB@svartdal.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <001901c61900$da1aed50$53849ed9@Puppy>
References: <1EF930FBA0A4BE01BAA2CEC8@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <001901c61900$da1aed50$53849ed9@Puppy>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: i_bryskin@yahoo.com, Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, kireeti@juniper.net
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ason-lexicography-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org


--On lørdag, januar 14, 2006 11:51:17 +0000 Adrian Farrel 
<adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

>> The document introduction contains random blank lines. I expect that the
>> RFC Editor will find them and make sure the paragraphs make sense.
>>
>> In section 3.9.1, H-LSP is not called out as a definition. I noticed
> only
>> because it maps to a specific ITU-T term. Text is clear enough that a
>> reader shouldn't be bothered by this, however; not worth holding the doc
>> for.
>
> I take this to mean that a new revision is NOT needed as a result of
> GenArt review and the process can continue without further input from the
> authors at this stage.

Yes, that's my opinion.

If you were to recycle the document for other reasons, this might be worth 
looking at, but this is not reason for a recycle.




_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email