Re: [Gen-art] [bmwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07

Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net> Tue, 25 May 2021 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B471A3A1421; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h-8sK3iNNfZ0; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:22:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xyz.hosed.xyz (xyz.hosed.xyz [71.114.67.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F3C3A144B; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xyz.hosed.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064DE13C1DA4; Tue, 25 May 2021 12:22:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at xyz.hosed.xyz
Received: from xyz.hosed.xyz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xyz.hosed.xyz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKJEJEDySo-V; Tue, 25 May 2021 12:22:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.16.12.111] (c-73-71-250-98.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.71.250.98]) by xyz.hosed.xyz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 659CB13C09A8; Tue, 25 May 2021 12:22:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
In-Reply-To: <162187348479.26422.14629939836393101285@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 09:22:11 -0700
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest.all@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <632621E5-0A55-4C5B-A285-A378AF5FC6C0@encrypted.net>
References: <162187348479.26422.14629939836393101285@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/6YjjcV8WqsaCCWWfL3SfSqnkdls>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [bmwg] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:22:21 -0000

Hi Ines,
     Thank you for your review. The authors are reviewing the feedback and plan to update shortly.

Thank you,
Sarah (Doc Shepherd)

> On May 24, 2021, at 9:24 AM, Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-07
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review Date: 2021-05-24
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-05-24
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This document defines methodologies for benchmarking Ethernet VPN (EVPN) and
> Provider Backbone Bridging EVPN (PBB-EVPN) performance. This document is
> Informational. No major issues found.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - Check punctuation, some sentences do not start with space after period.  e.g.
> page 16 "... sample.The time ..." - Some paragraphs do not start with
> upper-case letter. e.g. page 10, "confirm the DUT..." - I would expand PBB-EVPN
> the first time used.  Perhaps in the introduction, "Provider Backbone Bridging
> EVPN (PBB-EVPN) is defined in RFC 7623, discussing how can be combined with
> EVPNs to provide a new/combined solution...."
> 
> Thank you for this document,
> 
> Ines
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg