Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-18

Meral Shirazipour <> Tue, 28 June 2016 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AA812D091 for <>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0FgNR8VDIxEE for <>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2975E12B035 for <>; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f796f6d000000e1e-b7-5772a9149123
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id EC.1A.03614.419A2775; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:43:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0294.000; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 12:44:02 -0400
From: Meral Shirazipour <>
To: Kevin Ma J <>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-18
Thread-Index: AdHQzk1P1TOJ+3GbR4a0b74/79fmOwAjMnfgAABCdXA=
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:44:02 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A4E65C33Feusaamb107erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprKIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPlK7IyqJwg8fnpS3OXVjKZnH11WcW ByaPJUt+Mnl8ufyZLYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSujd/Y0toJ5BRWzJ/1nb2A8mtzFyMkhIWAi 8XbBVRYIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAkcZJeZducUK4SxnlHh47AEjSBWbgIXE9t/PWUFsEQENiT2b 9rGDFDELdDFKXJxzCaiIg0NYwEWieRsHRI2rxOaNH9ggbCuJq69ugG1jEVCVuLf5B9hMXgFf ic07m6CWTWSUWLTuLFgDp4CfxNc7v5hBbEag876fWsMEYjMLiEvcejKfCeJsAYkle84zQ9ii Ei8f/2OFsJUkJi09xwpRny/Rc382M8QyQYmTM5+wTGAUnYVk1CwkZbOQlEHEdSQW7P7EBmFr Syxb+JoZxj5z4DETsvgCRvZVjBylxQU5uelGhpsYgZF1TILNcQfj3l7PQ4wCHIxKPLwPFhaG C7EmlhVX5h5ilOBgVhLhzVtSFC7Em5JYWZValB9fVJqTWnyIUZqDRUmcV/+lYriQQHpiSWp2 ampBahFMlomDU6qBMd9ZQGryRBeX89OPmu30mFvmzc9lqhR86sfSjAQdc691S6QXma7Xi7TW Z63vNha4t+b1wePG+2JdNCI1il9O7Xq+8NQl3Vdlm2uSglXWTV/z1MtzXY9V6cx/jFkqX4xL nuYa3uxa7MaZrvI6K+LX5pLj2yfP+nTwGo8i96P0Vc1bE7+o6SfzKrEUZyQaajEXFScCAJjL bkqoAgAA
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-18
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:44:10 -0000

  Thank you for considering the comments.


From: Kevin Ma J
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:38 AM
To: Meral Shirazipour;;
Subject: RE: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-18

Hi Meral,

  Thanks for the review.  We will fix the typos in the next revision.

> Question: The $ character is not described. What does $$ mean if $? is the one character match?

  The "$" is the escape character, so "$$" allows the use of an actual dollar sign in the text.  Will add clarification text.

> General, does the "MI" prefix stand for "Metadata Interface"?

  Correct, MI stands for Metadata Interface.  The convention has been to prefix the payload types with the interface abbreviation.


--  Kevin J. Ma

From: Meral Shirazipour []
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 7:49 PM
Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-18

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at .

Document: draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-18
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2016-06-27
IETF LC End Date:  2016-06-27
IESG Telechat date: 2016-07-07

This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have some comments.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
-[Page 19]:
Property: pattern
         Description: A pattern for string matching.  The pattern can
         contain the wildcards * and ?, where * matches any sequence of
         characters (including the empty string) and ? matches exactly
         one character.  The three literals $, * and ? should be escaped
         as $$, $* and $?. All other characters are treated as literals.

Question: The $ character is not described. What does $$ mean if $? is the one character match?

-[Page 20], section 4.1.6,
"to evaulate"--typo-->"to evaluate"
"is specifed"--typo-->"is specified"

-[Page 24], section

-[Page 50-54], sections 7.1.1 to 7.1.20
"capabilitiy"--typo?-->"capability" (many times)

-General, does the "MI" prefix stand for "Metadata Interface"?

Best Regards,
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson Research<>