Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-5322upd-from-group-06

[Ned Freed <[e-mail]>]

> --On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:00 -0700
> [e-mail] wrote:

> >> A single sentence summarizing what benefit is achieved with
> >> the change, along with a couple of usage examples, would go a
> >> long way towards showing how this update helps in practical
> >> ways.
> >
> > I could live with a single sentence, but I strongly object to
> > the inclusion
> > of examples, for the reasons I gave in my original response.

> Would a possible middle ground be to include a single
> well-crafted sentence with an informative citation of
> draft-ietf-eai-popimap-downgrade?  That document does contain
> examples and an explanation of that particular use case.

> I'd prefer to avoid that entirely for the same reasons Ned
> cites, but it would, IMO, be good to get on with this rather
> than quibbling for days or weeks.

Channeling my inner Maslow, I see the present text as best, an additional
sentence or two as next best, a sentence and a cite to the downgrade doc next
in line, and including actual EAI examples in this doc as the worst choice.

FWIW.

				Ned