Re: [Gen-art] IETF LC & telechat Review of draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-06

["Eunsook \"Eunah\" Kim" <[e-mail]>]

Dear Pete McCann,

Thanks a lot for your comments.
We, the authors, surely apply your comments and provide revised text
after collecting all comments.

-Eunah

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:57 AM, McCann Peter-A001034
<[e-mail]> wrote:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer
> for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you
> may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-06
> Reviewer: Pete McCann
> Review Date: 2010-05-13
> IETF LC End Date: 2010-05-13
> IESG Telechat date: 2010-05-20
>
> Summary: Ready
>
> Major issues: None
>
> Minor issues: None
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> Section 1 Introduction:
>   by either at below IP layer (the
>   adaptation layer or LLC) or the IP layer.
> SHOULD BE:
>   either below the IP layer (the
>   adaptation layer or LLC) or at the IP layer.
>
> Section 6:
>   Security issues are described in Section 4.4 of the security
>   considerations of RFC 4919 [RFC4919] and RFC 4944 [RFC4944] apply as
>   well.
> SHOULD BE:
>   Security issues as described in Section 4.4 of the security
>   considerations of RFC 4919 [RFC4919] and RFC 4944 [RFC4944] apply as
>   well.
>
>