[Gen-art] IETF LC & telechat Review of draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-06

"McCann Peter-A001034" <pete.mccann@motorola.com> Fri, 14 May 2010 01:58 UTC

Return-Path: <pete.mccann@motorola.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4483A67FE for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 18:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.592
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.592 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.148, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UqT2X1Bo2uSM for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 18:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail128.messagelabs.com (mail128.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1493A67AD for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 18:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: pete.mccann@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-7.tower-128.messagelabs.com!1273802269!7061303!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.8]
Received: (qmail 11147 invoked from network); 14 May 2010 01:57:49 -0000
Received: from motgate8.mot.com (HELO motgate8.mot.com) (129.188.136.8) by server-7.tower-128.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 14 May 2010 01:57:49 -0000
Received: from il06exr03.mot.com (il06exr03.mot.com [129.188.137.133]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4E1vnRV006012 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 18:57:49 -0700 (MST)
Received: from il06vts03.mot.com (il06vts03.mot.com [129.188.137.143]) by il06exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id o4E1vmZt015777 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 20:57:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from de01exm70.ds.mot.com (de01exm70.am.mot.com [10.176.8.26]) by il06exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id o4E1vmPY015769 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 20:57:48 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 21:57:26 -0400
Message-ID: <274D46DDEB9F2244B2F1EA66B3FF54BC06B2EE02@de01exm70.ds.mot.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: IETF LC & telechat Review of draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-06
Thread-Index: AcrzCM2P2YyFI3H4Sx+Q9WfM21jZWg==
From: McCann Peter-A001034 <pete.mccann@motorola.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements.all@tools.ietf.org
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [Gen-art] IETF LC & telechat Review of draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 01:58:04 -0000

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer 
for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see 
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you 
may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-06
Reviewer: Pete McCann
Review Date: 2010-05-13
IETF LC End Date: 2010-05-13
IESG Telechat date: 2010-05-20

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

Section 1 Introduction:
   by either at below IP layer (the
   adaptation layer or LLC) or the IP layer.
SHOULD BE:
   either below the IP layer (the
   adaptation layer or LLC) or at the IP layer.

Section 6:
   Security issues are described in Section 4.4 of the security
   considerations of RFC 4919 [RFC4919] and RFC 4944 [RFC4944] apply as
   well.
SHOULD BE:
   Security issues as described in Section 4.4 of the security
   considerations of RFC 4919 [RFC4919] and RFC 4944 [RFC4944] apply as
   well.