[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-03.txt

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Sat, 09 September 2006 18:37 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GM7hR-0000Ow-07; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:37:05 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GM7hO-0000Oi-VL for gen-art@ietf.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:37:02 -0400
Received: from tao.fdupont.fr ([82.236.136.93]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GM7hN-0003Fp-GH for gen-art@ietf.org; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:37:02 -0400
Received: from tao.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.fdupont.fr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k89IahpT009385; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:36:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from tao.fdupont.fr (dupont@localhost) by tao.fdupont.fr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) with ESMTP id k89Iagxv009381; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 20:36:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200609091836.k89Iagxv009381@tao.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 20:36:42 +0200
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: davidb@verisign.com, townsley@cisco.com
Subject: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-03.txt
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other
Last Call comments you may receive.

Summary: Ready

Minor points (they should be fixed by the RFC Editor):
 - in 1 page 3: a missing closing parenthesis. I suggest to add the
   number of the RFCs too.
 - is "validatable" (in 4 page 7 and 6 page 9) a correct English word?
 - in 10.2 page 13 reference [6] is obsolete: a new version 03 was
   submitted in June.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art