[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-03.txt

Francis Dupont wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
> draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-experiments-03.txt
> For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.

Thanks for the review, Francis!

> Please resolve these comments along with any other
> Last Call comments you may receive.
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> Minor points (they should be fixed by the RFC Editor):
>  - in 1 page 3: a missing closing parenthesis. I suggest to add the
>    number of the RFCs too.

Sounds good.

>  - is "validatable" (in 4 page 7 and 6 page 9) a correct English word?

Er, I guess not :)  I suggest rewording (from 4 on page 7):

  That is, a zone is either in an experiment and only experimentally
  validatable, or it is not.

with

  That is, a zone is either in an experiment and only possible to
  validate experimentally, or it is not.

And suggest rewording (from 6 on page 9):

  For instance, the resolver may look at a non-validatable response and
  conclude that the response is bogus, either due to local policy or
  implementation details.

with

  For instance, the resolver my look at a response that cannot be
  validated and still conclude that the response is bogus, either due to
  local policy or implementation details.

>  - in 10.2 page 13 reference [6] is obsolete: a new version 03 was
>    submitted in June.

Ah yes.

Again, thanks for the review.

-- 
David Blacka                      <davidb@verisignlabs.com>
Sr. Engineer    VeriSign Infrastructure Product Engineering

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art