[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-03
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 23 October 2006 20:35 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gc6Vr-0003uw-Hq; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:35:11 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gc6Vq-0003uf-4Q for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:35:10 -0400
Received: from esc71.midphase.com ([216.246.11.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gc6Vo-0002BH-TO for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:35:10 -0400
Received: from esc71.midphase.com ([216.246.11.148] helo=LC1.labn.net) by esc71.midphase.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1Gc6Va-0000wB-5g; Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:34:54 -0400
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20061023163332.046f0cf0@labn.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:34:55 -0400
To: Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20061023134031.041262d0@zircon.juniper.net>
References: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F2403495AB7@esebe105.NOE.Noki a.com> <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F2403495AB7@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com> <5.0.0.25.2.20061023134031.041262d0@zircon.juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc71.midphase.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Cc: ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com, dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be, ibryskin@movaz.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Ross,
Given 198 just got assigned to an unrelated object, I have
no doubt that IANA will catch this...
Lou
At 01:43 PM 10/23/2006, Ross Callon wrote:
>I think that I should enter an RFC editor's note to correct this.
>
>Ross
>
>At 06:05 PM 10/20/2006 -0400, Lou Berger wrote:
>>Pasi,
>> Good catch. Section 9.4., Secondary Record Route Object
>> should have suggested 199.
>>
>>Lou
>>
>>At 04:55 AM 10/20/2006, Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
>>>reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
>>>http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>>>
>>>Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
>>>or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>>>
>>>Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-03
>>>Reviewer: Pasi Eronen
>>>Review Date: 2006-10-20
>>>IESG Telechat date: 2006-10-26
>>>
>>>Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
>>>
>>>Comments:
>>>
>>>I reviewed version -02 of this document during IETF Last Call, and my
>>>comments have been addressed in version -03.
>>>
>>>There is one minor nit (but IANA/RFC editor will take care of it):
>>>sections 9.3 and 9.4 suggest the same value (198) forthe
>>>SECONDARY_EXPLICIT_ROUTE and SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE objects.
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>>Pasi
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art