[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-03
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 20 October 2006 22:05 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb2V1-0004hO-VM; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:05:55 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb2V0-0004hJ-42 for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:05:54 -0400
Received: from esc71.midphase.com ([216.246.11.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb2Uy-0003En-TE for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:05:54 -0400
Received: from esc71.midphase.com ([216.246.11.148] helo=LC1.labn.net) by esc71.midphase.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1Gb2Ut-0005zL-78; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:05:47 -0400
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20061020180450.05722548@labn.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:05:33 -0400
To: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F2403495AB7@esebe105.NOE.Noki a.com>
References: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F2403495AB7@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - esc71.midphase.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc: ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, dimitri.papadimitriou@alcatel.be, adrian@olddog.co.uk, rcallon@juniper.net, ibryskin@movaz.com, lberger@labn.net
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Pasi,
Good catch. Section 9.4., Secondary Record Route Object
should have suggested 199.
Lou
At 04:55 AM 10/20/2006, Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com wrote:
>I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
>reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
>http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
>Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
>or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
>
>Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-segment-recovery-03
>Reviewer: Pasi Eronen
>Review Date: 2006-10-20
>IESG Telechat date: 2006-10-26
>
>Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC.
>
>Comments:
>
>I reviewed version -02 of this document during IETF Last Call, and my
>comments have been addressed in version -03.
>
>There is one minor nit (but IANA/RFC editor will take care of it):
>sections 9.3 and 9.4 suggest the same value (198) forthe
>SECONDARY_EXPLICIT_ROUTE and SECONDARY_RECORD_ROUTE objects.
>
>Best regards,
>Pasi
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art