[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-yang-06
Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Tue, 09 October 2018 07:02 UTC
Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DACD1310C5; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 00:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: softwires@ietf.org, draft-ietf-softwire-yang.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.86.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153906852401.12167.787771047236561407@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:02:04 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/BJI3kgwDDC6CN-YN2jPUC7VuRCQ>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-softwire-yang-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 07:02:04 -0000
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-softwire-yang-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2018-10-08 IETF LC End Date: 2018-10-11 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: 1. In section 1 it says that the YANG data model can be used with netconf , I noticed that restconf is only mentioned in the security section as network management. why not add restconf to introduction?