Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-tdim-mib-07.txt

Moti Morgenstern <Moti.Morgenstern@ecitele.com> Mon, 12 March 2012 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <Moti.Morgenstern@ecitele.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA7821F86B2 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJmr8XAjGPAL for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2B121F8700 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 01:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [85.158.139.83:63749] by server-10.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id D4/9D-08260-984BD5F4; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:32:09 +0000
X-Env-Sender: Moti.Morgenstern@ecitele.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-14.tower-182.messagelabs.com!1331541128!18028651!1
X-Originating-IP: [168.87.1.157]
X-StarScan-Version: 6.5.7; banners=-,-,-
Received: (qmail 15090 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2012 08:32:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fridlppsb001.ecitele.com) (168.87.1.157) by server-14.tower-182.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2012 08:32:08 -0000
X-AuditID: a8571401-b7f316d000000b60-9b-4f5db48bdaa5
Received: from FRGRWPVCH001.ecitele.com (frgrwpvch001.ecitele.com [10.1.18.35]) by fridlppsb001.ecitele.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id CE.87.02912.B84BD5F4; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:32:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from FRIDWPPMB002.ecitele.com ([169.254.4.46]) by FRGRWPVCH001.ecitele.com ([10.1.18.35]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.001; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:32:08 +0100
From: Moti Morgenstern <Moti.Morgenstern@ecitele.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-tdim-mib-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHM/85nBCOGYrymOkSDkmA8QaBr0pZmUtAg
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:32:07 +0000
Message-ID: <26A039154CECA44E8863CBD1F1D9B2F101516C@FRIDWPPMB002.ecitele.com>
References: <4F5D19A9.3030704@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F5D19A9.3030704@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.5.41.29]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA2VTa2jTUBj1NmmW1UZinfauiMQL+6Guo1MnFbYpPrCCUnXiE5kxvbbRNg1N J6siVBDHhroX4pzObTqfOKdT8TF1OHHgW3yAqFPQ4ViHiOtE1PlIGjcn5te53znfOfdLvtCE pY+y0aIUxiGJ9yPKRJrAMJt95/k1bkfjEcZ5/dBl0nm76EOS81ksTjqrDnxNmkm6WjraKde3 z88oV0PDV4Or70mcWkSuioJsXpKCYT6MOQ9WhBy0KCRu4oUI4kRPDspEnOznBRzAUjgH8bKM JQ/KNXH/PdmqTJQ4LAlBjyh5c9D8PLfd6cyabs9EuUt9osJhe4AX/VwAKwrvxZxa0SaQPGtP E77+1lpCLjcXfiorBVEQTy4ByTRkp8KzT8+SOh4DH71uokqAibawTwCMX+gw6ocGAEuu/0qo KDYL9vU2GTScwk6G5adbSE1EsFUGWFzfSGnEKHYevHKt36iLXLD1x0tioGF/5a9EnWTT4KML b4CGGXYhvHdyb5KGLewkGLtZkcDJbDq8GXua0AP1el/unEoEE6wVvuisNejXZmHD1YeEjkfD 7nc/jToeB3t27/mjT4d1Lb2UjifBo/U9hJ47Et7e1/ln/FR44/hzsgxYq4dEVA9prx7SXj2k vQ6QJ4F1fUj0yLKyzuHIzMCCGMZ+nCEEA81A3Z3jy1PAJfB2V0YbYGmAzEzV4jVui5HfpEQC bSCVNqDRTNMZtTRiXdAT8fGKLz9U4MdKG4A0gVKYDftVjvHwkc04FBygnOo7LCdsw4Wg9o3D +VMcjn8OyMo0Lcl1W1ivungbMZZxaKB1LE0jyFScU11HhrAXF64X/eG/tIFO1pLNanKNpmEU mQ8oolfn74A0uuxT42NgIaWghG1W5qImYjWRr0Aa9IkBqzrrKKZWY83qIg46xFRzg2oeN63W zNUfY5CyRcHkKUU7a7aP7RmxonNX3lYXEeZWTiiKGO+mfbf3ji98PDtqq+RfR4+V1rw7nB27 lfZqWWX3+9J+tMM8d8WNE1297bOKu4rPFByc0dLxdsGG7ry21orI8PuyYdvdS1Am61H2+FRh TvPLB7n5K4va3TPexzonXBaOZnVN2/KNLjfTH5cjUvHxmROJkML/Bhf3PbQHBAAA
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 05:09:03 -0700
Cc: "draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-tdim-mib.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-tdim-mib.all@tools.ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Menachem Dodge <Menachem.Dodge@ecitele.com>, "'EdwardB@actelis.com' \(EdwardB@actelis.com\)" <EdwardB@actelis.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-tdim-mib-07.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:32:15 -0000

Hi Suresh,

We use the 'gBondTdimOperSvcPosition' not only as an index into a table but also report that field as part of a notification message. I believe that having MAX-ACCESS of 'not-accessible' would be problematic.
Just as a reminder, the only index into the famous interfaces table (RFC 2863) is ifIndex and its MAX-ACCESS is also 'read-only'.  Again, it might be because ifIndex appears also in notification messages (such as linkup and linkDown)

Best Regards,
Moti
-----Original Message-----
From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com] 
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 11:31 PM
To: General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-tdim-mib.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-tdim-mib-07.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-ietf-adslmib-gbond-tdim-mib-07.txt

For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. I do have a potential concern that you may like to address.

Minor
=====

* Section 6: MIB definition

The index field 'gBondTdimOperSvcPosition' of 'gBondTdimOperSvcEntry' is defined to have a MAX-ACCESS of 'read-only'. I believe that it should instead be defined with a MAX-ACCESS of 'not-accessible' since it is an index field.

Thanks
Suresh












This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.