IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 24 August 2021 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3569D3A0EFA; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 05:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rcel_r4JHGfg; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 05:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B7DA3A116F; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 05:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:1815:5480:b768:b865]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 931AA600370; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:45:00 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1629809100; bh=xxQ+coKxwYU2qZd3rBurGMOGnx6VdvKkaTwOIj+iQsA=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=hk9sA3WiZM2kht5kRd0eLuCpS4XIYPQlFKnJFDRlSbrEd2uwM2x4RdRUlyb1cXw6x 99/rBNdrTVKCwygPqNPUpIRprarDQr7k5Q6+cNvWHnmEm9C+SIWsF9aW+VUDS2zsxU bnMbL2/ODZHtOJLfSLSeBzf8Anwoz+pQr5Yf66lg=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <88F99C24-BD60-48F6-ACBD-3CFD70574580@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9C7F14E0-CBA4-4012-A964-8D270109717D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:45:00 +0300
In-Reply-To: <162749018882.14459.4290674095400077450@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
To: Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@arm.com>
References: <162749018882.14459.4290674095400077450@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 931AA600370.A02CC
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/BKbNUEK0V4wy5j8nIZlyJKiULE4>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:45:21 -0000

Thomas, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars


> On 2021-7-28, at 19:36, Thomas Fossati via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Thomas Fossati
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-proxy-status-05
> Reviewer: Thomas Fossati
> Review Date: 2021-07-28
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-08-11
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> The document describes a new header/trailer field that HTTP intermediaries can
> use to insert further details related to their handling of responses inline,
> for example to assist debugging of complex HTTP delivery topologies.  The
> described mechanism addresses the problem in a simple, elegant and extensible
> way.  The document is well written and the instructions to IANA are clear and
> actionable.
> 
> Major issues: none
> 
> Minor issues: none
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> Is it "https://iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-statuses (plural) or
> https://iana.org/assignments/http-proxy-status (singular)?  Or are these two
> different things -- in which case I am not sure what the difference would be?
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email