Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios-15
Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Mon, 04 April 2011 20:48 UTC
Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2966C28C105 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.111
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.111 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.488, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xDyt-zOoNqFU for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CB83A67B7 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p34KoJO0005819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:50:24 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.203]) by eusaamw0712.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.181]) with mapi; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:50:18 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:50:18 -0400
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios-15
Thread-Index: Acvvrm29e8J4o079RI6cQ7wuZ7kw3gDWweOg
Message-ID: <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150F16A087E@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <4FD1E7CD248BF84F86BD4814EDDDBCC150F1612D1C@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> <83221A54-96F1-47F7-A714-77BBC7BB7B69@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <83221A54-96F1-47F7-A714-77BBC7BB7B69@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios.all@tools.ietf.org>, Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>, General
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 20:48:43 -0000
Hi Robert, That makes sense. I did not realize that using a RFC5735 address in an inside NAT context would cause confusion. If that is the case please leave them as is. Thanks Suresh > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjsparks@nostrum.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 10:18 AM > To: Suresh Krishnan > Cc: draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios.all@tools.ietf.org; > General Area Review Team; Gonzalo Camarillo > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of > draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios-15 > > Suresh - > > The addresses you are pointing to are not generic example > addresses, they are "inside NAT example addresses". At one > point in the draft's history they changed to use 5735 > addresses, but the reviewers objected, feeling that using > 1918 addresses were more sensible for these examples. > > RjS > > > On Mar 30, 2011, at 1:14 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > > > Resending due to a tools alias failure (that has been fixed now) > > > > Thanks > > Suresh > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:gen-art-bounces@ietf.org] On > > Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 11:50 PM > > To: General Area Review Team; > > draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios.all@tools.ietf.org > > Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of > > draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios-15 > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for > > draft-ietf-sipping-nat-scenarios-15 > > > > For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. > > > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last > Call comments you may receive. > > > > Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an > Informational RFC but it has an issue that probably needs to > be fixed before publication. > > > > Minor > > ===== > > > > * The draft uses addresses from the RFC1918 space in the > examples instead of using the addresses reserved for > documentation in RFC 5735 (i.e. 192.0.2.0/24, > 198.51.100.0/24, and 203.0.113.0/24). It would be good if > this can be fixed in the draft. > > > > Thanks > > Suresh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gen-art mailing list > > Gen-art@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > >
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Suresh Krishnan