Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-05.txt

Peter Saint-Andre <Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com> Tue, 04 January 2011 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F833A6C45 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:38:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jub2hUrO0gpR for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw1.webex.com (gw1.webex.com [64.68.122.208]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 923B33A6C14 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SRV-EXSC03.webex.local ([192.168.252.197]) by gw1.webex.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 14:40:40 -0800
Received: from 10.89.0.15 ([10.89.0.15]) by SRV-EXSC03.webex.local ([192.168.252.200]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:40:40 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.12.0.080729
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:40:38 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-ID: <C948EFF6.DD1C%Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART telechat review of draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-05.txt
Thread-Index: Acurjj39NwdANFz4Qp+tsmimtQ7K5AADJfLTADFkrWU=
In-Reply-To: <C947A47D.DCA7%Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2011 22:40:40.0687 (UTC) FILETIME=[6A1637F0:01CBAC60]
Cc: draft-loreto-http-bidirectional.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-05.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 22:38:35 -0000

Seeing no objections 24 hours later, I'll go ahead and post -07 with this
adjusted text and one other small fix.


On 1/3/11 4:06 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com> wrote:

> Hi Brian,
> 
> After receiving feedback from my co-authors, I have wordsmithed the relevant
> text to:
> 
>    The authors acknowledge that both the "HTTP long polling" and "HTTP
>    streaming" mechanisms stretch the original semantic of HTTP and that
>    the HTTP protocol was not designed for bidirectional communication.
>    This document neither encourages nor discourages the use of these
>    mechanisms, and takes no position on whether they provide appropriate
>    solutions to the problem of providing bidirectional communication
>    between clients and servers.  Instead, this document merely
>    identifies technical issues with these mechanisms and suggests best
>    practices for their deployment.
> 
> If you have concerns with that revised text, please let us know.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> On 1/3/11 2:35 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> The -06 version responds to my comment, thanks.
>> 
>> Regards
>>    Brian Carpenter
>> 
>> 
>> On 2011-01-02 09:09, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>> Please see attached review.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>