IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-05.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 04 January 2011 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2D73A6A26 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:04:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.36
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.36 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.239, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FlChmfAVdAcQ for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:04:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B073A6A15 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 15:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws7 with SMTP id 7so6087652vws.31 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:07:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gWSySeolxeEHElpb49dn03dOkSjoSMjPgbggpjUxrGU=; b=xPwhRf33mTiz9g/2i9X6Tw/MUPgyryoXhYGzmtdVtH4ihYllxyCb5PHI1fyzdkwWee S7e7PEruL+IiC9yvUXPtx9+EBsnIgL8omeA7o+4jRK7UWhKeFIwd9+GI0gk9+rB8oE6v mE4BVEoy0XQdII1O2vOvTBbMH9s/Z58cp/kDY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=pS8PCMy52LG/Wmihsu7jucpiwfXQAG4YSNEln1ONi3yrcLzYWDn8SXWUaAW5ohsHFu doUdFIdYIV4IdbUJyTvI9xPYOZtXZ6sn6jLtmqsm06cMAT2LMGgmC9RI6dmBb/YjhghM fF2ozr1SVBvo0Dt7M0FTVs/dtTQ6xebLW4YW4=
Received: by 10.220.192.129 with SMTP id dq1mr1377266vcb.255.1294182420530; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.216.38.124] (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u4sm4718605vch.12.2011.01.04.15.06.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D23A80D.1000709@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:06:53 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <C948EFF6.DD1C%Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>
In-Reply-To: <C948EFF6.DD1C%Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-loreto-http-bidirectional.all@tools.ietf.org, Peter Saint-Andre <Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-05.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:04:55 -0000

For Russ's benefit, the -07 version resolves my comment.

Regards
   Brian

On 2011-01-05 11:40, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Seeing no objections 24 hours later, I'll go ahead and post -07 with this
> adjusted text and one other small fix.
> 
> 
> On 1/3/11 4:06 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <Peter.SaintAndre@webex.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> After receiving feedback from my co-authors, I have wordsmithed the relevant
>> text to:
>>
>>    The authors acknowledge that both the "HTTP long polling" and "HTTP
>>    streaming" mechanisms stretch the original semantic of HTTP and that
>>    the HTTP protocol was not designed for bidirectional communication.
>>    This document neither encourages nor discourages the use of these
>>    mechanisms, and takes no position on whether they provide appropriate
>>    solutions to the problem of providing bidirectional communication
>>    between clients and servers.  Instead, this document merely
>>    identifies technical issues with these mechanisms and suggests best
>>    practices for their deployment.
>>
>> If you have concerns with that revised text, please let us know.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> On 1/3/11 2:35 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The -06 version responds to my comment, thanks.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>    Brian Carpenter
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2011-01-02 09:09, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>>> Please see attached review.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email