[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-10
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Fri, 03 June 2011 03:31 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A61E07EC for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yQxsK0op40RF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.out.tigertech.net (hermes.out.tigertech.net [74.114.88.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13627E07DE for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF06943009F; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at hermes.tigertech.net
Received: from [10.10.10.101] (pool-71-161-52-156.clppva.btas.verizon.net [71.161.52.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hermes.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BC9B4300E2; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4DE8557A.30205@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:31:06 -0400
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "A. Jean Mahoney" <mahoney@nostrum.com>
References: <4DE80611.1070108@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DE80611.1070108@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, lionel.morand@orange-ftgroup.com
Subject: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 03:31:12 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-10 Diameter Attribute-Value Pairs for Cryptographic Key Transport Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 02-June-2011 IETF LC End Date: 14-June-2011 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is probably ready for publication as a proposed standard Open Question: The document carefully and reasonably does not define the contents of the keying material AVP. This reviewer presumes that those closer to the activity will know where the contents have been or will be defined. Are they already defined, or will they be defined in future documents? If they are already defined, would it make sense to state that, and identify the location? (My confusion is that it would seem difficult for existing RFCs to define the format of a TLV that did not exist. But that may be a failure of my understanding.) Thank you, Joel M. Halpern
- [Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2011… A. Jean Mahoney
- [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-10 Joel M. Halpern
- [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dime-local-keytran-11 Joel M. Halpern