[Gen-art] 答复: 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10

"Lidan (Dan)" <huawei.danli@huawei.com> Wed, 06 February 2013 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <huawei.danli@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8522221F85D2; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:52:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.092
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.358, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6pVzy2ghkhyP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:52:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5650A21F8596; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 16:52:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AOE80256; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:52:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 00:51:22 +0000
Received: from SZXEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.93) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 00:52:20 +0000
Received: from szxeml555-mbx.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.229]) by szxeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.93]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:52:15 +0800
From: "Lidan (Dan)" <huawei.danli@huawei.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10
Thread-Index: AQHOAkKfFPU9gjEKO0O3gq+ZfCNfU5hqkSYwgAA9MICAAAxwAIABKJCg
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:52:14 +0000
Message-ID: <92A1F6CF27D54D4DA5364E59D892A02A38851F2B@szxeml555-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <543BED18-B326-4649-A35C-0BFB2FAA2E35@bbn.com> <92A1F6CF27D54D4DA5364E59D892A02A388518AA@szxeml555-mbx.china.huawei.com> <51111613.7070300@labn.net> <CAL02cgTosa9Y1R4UOyPXZAwOZ_X7KRrDEdJ3p98uGD3XHKaYsw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgTosa9Y1R4UOyPXZAwOZ_X7KRrDEdJ3p98uGD3XHKaYsw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.73.151]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_92A1F6CF27D54D4DA5364E59D892A02A38851F2Bszxeml555mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:02:19 -0800
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] 答复: 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:52:26 -0000

Ok, the old formats of Config/ConfigAck/ConfigNack are not necessary to be repeated in this draft. I will clean the text.

Thanks,

Dan


发件人: Richard Barnes [mailto:rlb@ipv.sx]
发送时间: 2013年2月5日 23:09
收件人: Lou Berger
抄送: Lidan (Dan); Richard Barnes; draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; The IESG
主题: Re: 答复: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-10

Hey Lou,

That text looks fine to me!

--Richard

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>> wrote:
Dan/Richard,


On 2/4/2013 10:05 PM, Lidan (Dan) wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review of this draft!
>
>> Section 2.1.  Would be helpful to either include the old formats
>> and/or say explicitly what is changing.

> Added the original format of Config, ConfigAck and ConfigNack
> messages which are defined in RFC4204.
>
I personally think it's a mistake to repeat definitions in non-bis RFCs.
 I think this increases the possibility of mistakes and confusion (e.g.,
when the text isn't copied properly or when the original document is
replaced).

My original thought was to propose text to follow Richard's suggestion
of explicitly saying what has changed, but I see such text is there at
the start of section 2:

   LMP Config, ConfigNack and ConfigAck messages are modified by this
   document to allow for the inclusion of multiple CONFIG objects. The
   Config and ConfigNack messages were only defined to carry one CONFIG
   object in [RFC4204]. The ConfigAck message, which was defined
   without carrying any CONFIG objects in [RFC4204], is modified to
   enable explicit identification of negotiated configuration
   parameters. The inclusion of CONFIG objects in ConfigAck messages is
   triggered by the use of the BehaviorConfig object (defined below) in
   a received Config message.

Richard,

Is this text sufficient?  Alternatively, this text can be moved to
immediately proceed the BNF.

Much thanks
Lou
(document co-author)