[Gen-art] Re: review of draft-miller-media-type-cellml-03.txt

Andrew Miller <ak.miller@auckland.ac.nz> Tue, 04 July 2006 07:46 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxfby-0002uV-4u; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 03:46:22 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxWLk-0005rf-UL for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:53:00 -0400
Received: from chico.itss.auckland.ac.nz ([130.216.190.12]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FxWLj-0001Da-A6 for gen-art@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:53:00 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by chico.itss.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB97343ED; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:52:57 +1200 (NZST)
Received: from chico.itss.auckland.ac.nz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpb.itss.auckland.ac.nz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02514-27; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:52:57 +1200 (NZST)
Received: from [130.216.208.135] (bioeng135.bioeng.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.208.135]) by chico.itss.auckland.ac.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F8A33F65; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 09:52:55 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <44A991B7.8080004@auckland.ac.nz>
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:52:55 +1200
From: Andrew Miller <ak.miller@auckland.ac.nz>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@point6.net>
References: <200607031844.k63IiIdb086044@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
In-Reply-To: <200607031844.k63IiIdb086044@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailhost.auckland.ac.nz
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 03:46:21 -0400
Cc: cellml-discussion@cellml.org, gen-art@ietf.org, lisa@osafoundation.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: review of draft-miller-media-type-cellml-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Francis Dupont wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
> draft-miller-media-type-cellml-03.txt
> For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
>   
Hi Francis,

Thanks for the review. Please see my inlined comments below.
> Please resolve these comments along with any other
> Last Call comments you may receive.
>
> Summary: ready
>
> Some little comments/suggestions which can be handled in AUTH48:
> the case of Format/format is not uniform, I propose Format everywhere
> if it is really a part of the name, or Format the first time and format
> for further cases, or format.
>   
I have changed all appearances of "Format" to "format", except in the 
phrase "CellML Umbrella Format Registry" (which is the correct case, as 
per the specification). I will be submitting a revised draft to correct 
this shortly.
> in 3: mathmatical -> mathematical
>   
This was fixed unintentionally in draft-miller-media-type-cellml-04, 
which has not yet been processed by the IETF secretariat.
> As the style is native (i.e,, not American) English I propose in 4 for
> Author/Change "shall" in place of "will" in "... itself will not change ."
>   
As the CellML Umbrella 1.0 specification is a non-IETF document, I don't 
believe shall or SHALL is appropriate in this case. However, the CellML 
team has endorsed the document, meaning that any future work will result 
in a new document with an increased version number. The phrase is 
therefore a statement of fact rather than a command, and so "will" is 
more appropriate than "shall".

Best regards,
Andrew Miller


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art