Re: [Gen-art] GEN-Art review of draft-ietf-isis-layer2-09

Ayan Banerjee <ayabaner@cisco.com> Thu, 27 January 2011 08:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ayabaner@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CC43A693A for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:21:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.532, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65Pi-PjCjO6O for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:21:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457423A6952 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:21:13 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4EAPe5QE2Q/khNgWdsb2JhbACkE2MVAQEWIiSfeZs/hU8EhRiHFYNM
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2011 08:24:15 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0R8O7YL004378; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:24:15 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-22b.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.112]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:24:14 -0800
Received: from 10.21.90.243 ([10.21.90.243]) by xmb-sjc-22b.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.112]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:24:13 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:24:12 -0800
From: Ayan Banerjee <ayabaner@cisco.com>
To: kathleen.moriarty@emc.com, dward@juniper.net
Message-ID: <C9666BAC.950C6%ayabaner@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: GEN-Art review of draft-ietf-isis-layer2-09
Thread-Index: AQHLt/2wAob0rzb7ikmRNGokzKa8iJPkhyvC
In-Reply-To: <AE31510960917D478171C79369B660FA0DAD9D6714@MX06A.corp.emc.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jan 2011 08:24:14.0493 (UTC) FILETIME=[950784D0:01CBBDFB]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:13:19 -0800
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-layer2@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] GEN-Art review of draft-ietf-isis-layer2-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:21:14 -0000

Kathleen,

Thanks much for your comments. I have incorporated them in the next revision
of the document. 

Thanks,
Ayan


On 1/19/11 9:24 AM, "kathleen.moriarty@emc.com" <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>
wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> 
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> 
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
> receive.
> 
> 
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-isis-layer2-09
> 
> Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty
> 
> Review Date: 19 January 2011
> 
> IETF LC End Date:
> 
> IESG Telechat date: (if known)
> 
> 
> 
> Summary:  The document looks pretty good overall, but there are some edits
> that are recommended below.
> 
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> 
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Abstract:
> 
> Include name for acronym TLV and IS-IS, both are used before being defined.
> 
> 
> 
> Include commas in the following sentence:
> 
> Change from: ³in this document are generic layer 2 additions and specific ones
> as needed are²
> 
> To: ³in this document are generic layer 2 additions and specific ones, as
> needed, are²
> 
> 
> 
> Section 1:
> 
> Paragraph 1, Line 5:
> 
> Change From: Layer
> 
> To: layer
> 
> 
> 
> Paragraph 2, Line 2:
> 
> Include acronym for PDU
> 
> 
> 
> Paragraph 2, Line 3:
> 
> Change from: ³generic layer 2 additions and specific ones as needed are
> defined in²
> 
> To: ³generic layer 2 additions and specific ones, as needed, are defined in²
> 
> 
> 
> Section 2:
> 
> Line 1:
> 
> Change from: ³In this section we specify the enhancements²
> 
> To either: ³This section specifies the enhancements²
> 
> Or: ³In this section, we specify the enhancements²
> 
> 
> 
> Line 2:
> 
> Change from: ³Layer-2²
> 
> To: ³layer 2²
> 
> OR make the use of this consistent in the document.
> 
> 
> Section 2.1:
> 
> Bullet 4:
> 
> Make use of ³Layer-2-IS-IS² consistent in the document.
> 
> 
> 
> Paragraph 2:
> 
> Note use of Level 1 and Layer 2 in this paragraph to make consistent (dash/no
> dash, upper or lower case ³L²)
> 
> 
> 
> Define acronym LSP in first line
> 
> 
> 
> Section 2.2:
> 
> Line 1:
> 
> Change from: ³Multi Topology aware²
> 
> To: ³Multi-Topology Aware²
> 
> 
> 
> Bullet 5 (acronym already defined, it can be completely spelled out or use the
> defined acronym):
> 
> Change From: ³sub-TLVs: The MT aware Port Capabilities TLV²
> 
> To: ³sub-TLVs: The MT-PORT_CAP TLV²
> 
> 
> 
> Last sentence: Include acronym for IIH.
> 
>