Re: [Gen-art] [certid] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-11

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 08 December 2010 20:55 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C193A6995; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:55:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.343
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.343 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.256, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4G5vBuTvzoAD; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:55:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB8E3A6988; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:55:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leavealone.cisco.com (72-163-0-129.cisco.com [72.163.0.129]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5427B4009B; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:09:08 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4CFFF129.10204@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:57:13 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
References: <4CFFEE6B.4060306@KingsMountain.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CFFEE6B.4060306@KingsMountain.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms080505050002030703070203"
Cc: draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, certid@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [certid] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-saintandre-tls-server-id-check-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 20:55:49 -0000

On 12/8/10 1:45 PM, =JeffH wrote:
>> We can tweak it to:
>>
>>    As an example, given an input URI of "sip:alice:pswd@
>>    example.net;transport=tcp?subject=project%20x&priority=urgent", the
>>    client derives the service type "sip" from the scheme and the domain
>>    name "example.net" from the authority component.  Also, given an
>>    input URI of "im:alice@example.net", the derived service type might
>>    be "sip", depending on how the example.net service is deployed (since
>>    the "im" scheme [CPIM] is defined as an abstract scheme in the SIP
>>    context by [SIP-IM]), and the domain name would again be
>>    "example.net".
> 
> works for me.
> 
> someone just noted offlist that we should perhaps change the scheme of
> the first URI to "sips".

Done.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/