Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-frwk-10.txt
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 13 June 2009 08:02 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026583A6A46 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.16
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, RELAY_IS_220=2.118, SARE_OBFU_SPLIT_HR2=0.183]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lwa7RJNxCKLn for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.systechtelecom.net (wcdcip8.systechtelecom.net [220.232.171.8]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2128A3A6892 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.systechtelecom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E058794DE; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:59:56 +0800 (HKT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at systechtelecom.net
Received: from mail.systechtelecom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.systechtelecom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLIpDbRhI2lj; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:59:56 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from your029b8cecfe (unknown [210.17.184.250]) by mail.systechtelecom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CBE879268; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:59:55 +0800 (HKT)
Message-ID: <66B470C92B6A437C87349BB4AF12D1F0@your029b8cecfe>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <4A325757.7050903@ieca.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:30:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-frwk@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, pce-ads@tools.ietf.org, pce-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-frwk-10.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:02:36 -0000
Thanks Sean, > Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication (informational > with no RFC 2119 requirements terminology), but has nits that should be > fixed before publication. > > I ran it through ID-nits: > - is a pre-5378 disclaimer needed? Will look at this, but I believe not. > - draft-ietf-pce-brpc has been published as RFC 5441 > - draft-ietf-pce-path-key has been published as RFC 5520 I'm sure the RFC editor will tidy up all references, but we will fix if a new revision gets spun first. > In 5.1, there's missing reference: PCEP [ <a href="'>RFC5440] Looks like the usual problem with the RFC database. Sometimes the database and idnits get out of synch on recently published RFCs with the result that the references appear bogus. But RFC5440 is alive and well. Cheers, Adrian
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pce-int… Sean Turner
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pce… Adrian Farrel