Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-nottingham-rfc5988bis-07

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

Hi Stewart,

Thanks for that. That part of IANA considerations is gone, after some consultation with IANA in Prague.

Cheers,


> On 25 Jul 2017, at 2:46 am, Stewart Bryant <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-nottingham-rfc5988bis-07
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2017-07-24
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-05-26
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-03
> 
> Summary: Ready except for some confusing IANA text - please see below.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: 
> 
> I find the following text very confusing:
> 
>   IANA will direct any incoming requests regarding the registry to this
>   document and, if defined, the processes established by the expert(s);
>   typically, this will mean referring them to the registry Web page.
>   Note that the expert(s) are allowed (as per Section 2.1.1.1) to
>   define additional fields to be collected in the registry.
> 
> You cannot direct a request to a document, and I am not sure you collect things
> in registry. It would be useful to take another look at the above text.
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/