Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-dcsc-channel-ext-03.txt

[Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]>]

Hi Miguel,

I think IANA owns the MIB module.

You're right, we should chase IANA to make sure they understand what to do.

Lou, can you ping them?

A
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Miguel A. Garcia" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>; 
<[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>
Cc: "General Area Review Team" <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 8:08 AM
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-dcsc-channel-ext-03.txt

>I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-dcsc-channel-ext-03.txt
> Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <[e-mail]>
> Review Date: 04-Feb-2010
> IETF LC End Date: 05-Feb-2010
> IESG Telechat date: (if known)
>
> Summary: The document is ready for publication as a Standards track RFC.
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> The document is well written and very clear. My only concern lies in 
> Section 4.1, last paragraph:
>
>    It should be noted that the assigned value should be reflected in
>    IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC at
>    http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianagmplstc-mib.
>
> So, I don't really know if IANA needs to modify the MIB, or someone needs 
> to modify the MIB and uploaded to IANA, or nothing is supposed to happen 
> here. I noticed in the I-D tracker that IANA is not planning to take any 
> action with respect the MIB, is this the authors' intention?
>
> /Miguel
>
> -- 
> Miguel A. Garcia
> [phone]
> Ericsson Spain
>