IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netext-ani-location-07

"Rajesh Pazhyannur (rpazhyan)" <rpazhyan@cisco.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 14:00 UTC

Return-Path: <rpazhyan@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB551A886A; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:00:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xcAlonLylAob; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94F7A1A8869; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:00:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10700; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1423663232; x=1424872832; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=QUKQ15w2jJkDHfkHo0dsfeRpSPfyLSfT271h5l4O4H4=; b=kzb1fsKHdqgDbv4M/9Bugno1R4mxQ7wa4rnpM6KcqHodQGGMlaAB8YCF ZMOO0Ugu7VhyBLLrbFw4pUakrWv2vPKgK+oJibFn/ctBSH3M3eBsMGA1J JYa/oWngA2/upiMmUIr+XL0dFQMRjMh2II890oIZH1wqN5XqNeJOoFInC Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CpBgA1YNtU/5tdJa1bgkNDUloEwFw8gWqFcQKBJEMBAQEBAQF8hAwBAQEELUwQAgEIDgMDAQIoByERFAkIAQEEAQ0FiBkDEQ3MNw2BC4Q4AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF41NggYTEQeEKgWGB4kbg1KEF4FGgRg2gk6IWoYDIoNubwGBQ38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,558,1418083200"; d="scan'208,217";a="122570993"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2015 14:00:27 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1BE0RIA018390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:00:27 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.4.43]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:00:27 -0600
From: "Rajesh Pazhyannur (rpazhyan)" <rpazhyan@cisco.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netext-ani-location-07
Thread-Index: AdBE/Jf0r11ORLLIQP+nf4uEwwr0BQA7weWA
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:00:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D1009518.1B932%rpazhyan@cisco.com>
References: <0b4701d044fc$9a4e3b50$ceeab1f0$@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0b4701d044fc$9a4e3b50$ceeab1f0$@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.6.141106
x-originating-ip: [10.24.76.151]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D10095181B932rpazhyanciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/MDSFvUhEowcwM1oVBPtFPOwJJ_k>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:17:52 -0800
Cc: "draft-ietf-netext-ani-location.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netext-ani-location.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netext-ani-location-07
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:00:34 -0000

Hello Roni

I have made the changes and will post an updated version (version 08) later today.

Thanks

Rajesh

From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com<mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 12:11 PM
To: "gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>" <gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>>, "ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>>
Cc: "draft-ietf-netext-ani-location.all@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-netext-ani-location.all@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-netext-ani-location.all@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-netext-ani-location.all@tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netext-ani-location-07
Resent-From: <draft-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org>>
Resent-To: <bpatil1+ietf@gmail.com<mailto:bpatil1+ietf@gmail.com>>, "brian@innovationslab.net<mailto:brian@innovationslab.net>" <brian@innovationslab.net<mailto:brian@innovationslab.net>>, John Kaippallimalil <John.Kaippallimalil@huawei.com<mailto:John.Kaippallimalil@huawei.com>>, "jouni.nospam@gmail.com<mailto:jouni.nospam@gmail.com>" <jouni.nospam@gmail.com<mailto:jouni.nospam@gmail.com>>, "rajeev.koodli@gmail.com<mailto:rajeev.koodli@gmail.com>" <rajeev.koodli@gmail.com<mailto:rajeev.koodli@gmail.com>>, Rajesh Pazhyannur <rpazhyan@cisco.com<mailto:rpazhyan@cisco.com>>, <sespeich@cisco.com<mailto:sespeich@cisco.com>>, <sgundave@cisco.com<mailto:sgundave@cisco.com>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 12:11 PM

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-netext-ani-location-07

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2015–2-10

IETF LC End Date: 2015–2-12

IESG Telechat date:



Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a standard track RFC.





Major issues:



Minor issues:




Nits/editorial comments:
In section 1 “PBU” and “WLC” are mentioned but the full name appears later in the document. Should be specified when first used.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email