Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis: Re: review of https://pad.isc.org/p/Kea_Planning_2018-01-25 (update)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 26 January 2018 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E9112DA08; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 05:07:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U5Qshk9RvluI; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 05:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E31112E858; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 05:07:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2214; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1516972049; x=1518181649; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2iakfUieY424i5juCpkN5WFyocKvXYMWlP6IC+EBKws=; b=J3868nXDZvYfOMlFbiUcyybUPOAhEAdeC8Frhc+Ra6CNivGEyy9Gqf23 LT0y9Lm9AtCO/9BF3MF3rjWANGXlIP2369D5plYvXcEmPcD6HsSenl9h0 UfoZfS2t7eXCF/TnjvSt5/a0oXhvpg7SR/7H3+IejvKTl8EkTinpnKECr o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DSAAB5J2ta/4wNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNCZnQnB4NWiiSOaoICkkmEe4IXCiOFGAIaggNUGAEBAQEBAQEBAmsohSQGIwQNRRACAQgQBAYCHwcCAgIwFRACBAENBYo1ELE8gW06ilYBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYEPg0OCFYM/KYMFgy8CAoFvgxcxgjQBBIsAmRMCiBWNTw2CDoYgi21IijeCYYlSAhEZAYE7AR85gVBwFWcBgX+DChiBNniMboEXAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,416,1511827200"; d="scan'208";a="346283174"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jan 2018 13:07:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (xch-rtp-009.cisco.com [64.101.220.149]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w0QD7QFQ030601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 26 Jan 2018 13:07:26 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-009.cisco.com (64.101.220.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:07:25 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:07:25 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis: Re: review of https://pad.isc.org/p/Kea_Planning_2018-01-25 (update)
Thread-Index: AQHTlgU3fFki2PFBmUCpMTBZDREE36OGJ2OA///5xwA=
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 13:07:25 +0000
Message-ID: <E03C03E0-2E62-42C9-8B92-1D42CAC232A0@cisco.com>
References: <201801251727.w0PHRU7c099701@givry.fdupont.fr> <a78f0c88-883b-215f-0940-1a8a2915ccd5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <a78f0c88-883b-215f-0940-1a8a2915ccd5@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <8F9D830DAF72834488FD7CC0184A6F58@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/N2gKd4ckVVxIoQJax1L8CWozS1E>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis: Re: review of https://pad.isc.org/p/Kea_Planning_2018-01-25 (update)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 13:07:31 -0000

Hi Francis, 
 
Thanks for the review. See inline. 

On 1/26/18, 3:29 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:

    Hi Francis,
    > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
    > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
    > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
    > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
    >
    > For more information, please see the FAQ at
    >
    > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
    >
    > Document: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09.txt
    > Reviewer: Francis Dupont
    > Review Date: 20180123
    > IETF LC End Date: 20180115
    > IESG Telechat date: 20180125
    >
    > Summary: Ready
    >
    > Major issues: None
    >
    > Minor issues: None
    >
    > Nits/editorial comments: (update)
    >   I noted these on the 06 version but I refer to 09 (last) version which
    > has been published since my review.
    >
    >   - 2 page 3: update RFC 2119 by RFC 8174 (or leave the RFC Editor to do
    >    this)

This was updated based on a previous comment from Ben Campbell. 

    >
    >   - Appendix E page 74 (twice): control-plane-protocl -> control-plane-protocol
    Good catch.
    I introduced an IESG note for this.


I fixed this in the -11 version to assure it wouldn't be missed.

Thanks,
Acee 
    
    Regards, Benoit
    >
    > I trust Yangdoctor about yang correctness.
    >
    > Thanks
    >
    > Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
    > .
    >