Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-transport-02.txt
Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Sat, 01 May 2010 08:27 UTC
Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3263A68A4 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2010 01:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4S8LUyCwzkO2 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 May 2010 01:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com (mail-ew0-f224.google.com [209.85.219.224]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D65A3A67C1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 May 2010 01:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so251040ewy.13 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 May 2010 01:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IwKtUYjtMI2l8EXTtk0E4L1gSApi5vt0n+nt1Gc1lXc=; b=xec9teJt3h0OjGMcY9Pg+cY4EzlM/r4lD0GmSmrfUJIm+yoRButFZcyL4foOqDeE4P V2fDeYvbamxAP7M5yxi7UR8ltI/1T/iPaEXMQht8bYJ7Y7ItbgQkx2gQ81m3USPGy1x4 1+xbl2NoXVbeII/lF0gNsGuXDE2nbPbKGVYEA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=PgQp0AG5+E+qMIqXBr84ziYRGL9dabar7Vf9BfMhAD+Eyxc9ipwq7QP4Jc+OLMTbQ6 IJ3hcfZIr1BbA5eRpDBpChTYwyrB/ceHm2OdzEUxfdsU0BLkfbS2tCIvHduDdcsfyyuM A1k3VfLWaZ+Pgs+BZBXNiuW7/wjrxfygzCWhU=
Received: by 10.213.42.140 with SMTP id s12mr4607809ebe.22.1272702417071; Sat, 01 May 2010 01:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbrim-mbp.local (64-103-25-233.cisco.com [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm1727899ewy.14.2010.05.01.01.26.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 01 May 2010 01:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BDBE5CB.4080201@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 04:26:51 -0400
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
References: <4BD1DF4D.4070505@gmail.com> <4BDAD695.3060902@bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BDAD695.3060902@bell-labs.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-transport-02.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2010 08:27:19 -0000
Vijay K. Gurbani allegedly wrote on 04/30/2010 09:09 EDT: > On 04/23/2010 12:56 PM, Scott Brim wrote: >> I'm just sending this internally. >> >> This draft is for "Transport of Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID) >> Messages", over XML over HTTP/TLS with a new TCP port number. I have >> two thoughts: (1) "I guess it works", and "Can't we do better than >> this?" but I don't know much about ops/mgmt so I can't say "this idea is >> painful to think about, you should do it this other way instead". So, >> >> - This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC. >> >> - Maybe one of you can say something more erudite. >> >> - Is this typical? It feels so top heavy. > > Scott: Do you want the above to be the summary stored on the Gen-ART > page? Please advise. > > Thanks, > > - vijay Yes :-). I can't do better and nobody else added anything.
- [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-moriarty-post-i… Scott Brim
- Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-moriarty-po… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-moriarty-po… Scott Brim