Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-transport-02.txt

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Fri, 30 April 2010 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5477B3A6AC0 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.723, BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oFnYNpeGKZEO for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8B73A6AF1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 06:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-63.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id o3UD8SO3011755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:08:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (Knoppix-135185238233.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.233]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id o3UD8SjQ012910; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:08:28 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4BDAD695.3060902@bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:09:41 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
References: <4BD1DF4D.4070505@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BD1DF4D.4070505@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-transport-02.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:09:28 -0000

On 04/23/2010 12:56 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
> I'm just sending this internally.
>
> This draft is for "Transport of Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)
> Messages", over XML over HTTP/TLS with a new TCP port number.  I have
> two thoughts: (1) "I guess it works", and "Can't we do better than
> this?" but I don't know much about ops/mgmt so I can't say "this idea is
> painful to think about, you should do it this other way instead".  So,
>
> - This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC.
>
> - Maybe one of you can say something more erudite.
>
> - Is this typical?  It feels so top heavy.

Scott: Do you want the above to be the summary stored on the Gen-ART
page?  Please advise.

Thanks,

- vijay