Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc6506bis-01.txt
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 03 December 2013 06:08 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE64C1AE051 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:08:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uZN_bYNNm2On for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913A51AE03E for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:08:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CED2CC61; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 08:08:26 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wAs3hRs7Hz93; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 08:08:26 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1BF2CC48; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 08:08:25 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <5282BD6E.7090807@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 08:08:25 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7A606433-489E-4099-8F2E-46275CABC6BB@piuha.net>
References: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE47030DDF4F@eusaamb101.ericsson.se> <5282BD6E.7090807@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-rfc6506bis.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-rfc6506bis.all@tools.ietf.org>, Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-rfc6506bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:08:32 -0000
Thank you Brian - another review that spotted important issues. Thanks all for taking care of this. I have placed a no-obj recommendation for the document in this week's telechat. Jari On Nov 13, 2013, at 1:44 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Acee. I will update the review when this comes up on > the IESG agenda. > > Brian > > On 13/11/2013 10:03, Acee Lindem wrote: >> Hi Brian, >> Thanks much for the review. I believe I've added all your comments - see >> inline. >> >> On 11/12/13 11:16 AM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> [Resending again with abject apologies for a typo in the To address.] >>> >>> [Resending with CC to the IETF list, since the ospf WG list >>> automatically rejects non-subscriber messages.] >>> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>> >>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments >>> you may receive. >>> >>> Document: draft-ietf-ospf-rfc6506bis-01.txt >>> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter >>> Review Date: 2013-11-12 >>> IETF LC End Date: 2013-11-26 >>> IESG Telechat date: >>> >>> Summary: Ready with issues >>> -------- >>> >>> Major issue: >>> ------------ >>> >>> The listed changes from RFC 6506 include: >>> >>>> 2. Section 3 previously advocated usage of an expired key for >>>> transmitted OSPFv3 packets when no valid keys existed. This >>>> statement has been removed. >>> I cannot see where this has been removed. In the last paragraph of >>> Section 3, the text starting: >>> >>>> In the event that the last key associated with an interface expires,... >>> has not been changed. Isn't that the text that should be removed? In fact, >>> shouldn't it be explicitly contradicted, to ensure that implementations >>> are changed to fail-secure rather than run-insecure? >> >> Sigh - good catch. We actually discussed the text on the list but I >> neglected to update it in the final revision. This is how the paragraph >> will read in the next revision. >> >> Key storage SHOULD persist across a system restart, warm or cold, to >> avoid operational issues. In the event that the last key associated >> with an interface expires, the network operator SHOULD be notified >> and the OSPFv3 packet MUST NOT be transmitted unauthenticated. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Nits: >>> ----- >>> >>> "errata" is a plural, often misused in this draft as a singular. The >>> singular >>> noun is "erratum". >> >> I replaced the 3 instances of "errata" with "erratum" in section 1.2. In >> the acknowledgements, the instances of "errata" were correct. >> >> >>> >>>> This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF >>>> Contributions published or made publicly available before November >>>> 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this >>> ... >>> >>> This disclaimer logically cannot be needed, since RFC6506 was published >>> after Nov. 10, 2008. >> >> I've removed this by updating the xml ipr tag to simply "trust200902". >> >> >>> >>> >>>> 6. Security Considerations >>> ... >>>> It addresses all the security >>>> issues that have been identified in [RFC6039]. >>> and in [RFC6506] (judging by section 1.2). >> >> Added the reference to RFC 6506. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-rf… Brian E Carpenter
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-rf… Brian E Carpenter
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ospf-rf… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-osp… Acee Lindem
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-osp… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-osp… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-osp… Jari Arkko