Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa-04

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 13 February 2012 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E99221F84F2 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:08:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.104, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Ey+vwbbHMs1 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:08:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F7621F84F1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:08:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA0DF24049; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:08:31 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lyYknvhRgbpR; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:07:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.104] (pool-96-241-165-215.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.165.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B00CF24024; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:08:30 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F271155.9080001@ogud.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:08:01 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <605759DF-CDD9-4B2D-A264-FC88512CEF7C@vigilsec.com>
References: <4f2570c6.11840e0a.6db6.09c6@mx.google.com> <4F271155.9080001@ogud.com>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa.all@tools.ietf.org, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:08:03 -0000

I have not seen a updated document to resolve this concern.

Russ


On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:

> On 29/01/2012 11:12, Roni Even wrote:
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
>> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
>> you may receive.
>> 
>> Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-ecdsa-04
>> 
>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>> 
>> Review Date:2012–1–29
>> 
>> IETF LC End Date: 2012–2–7
>> 
>> IESG Telechat date:
>> 
>> Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an Informational RFC.
>> 
>> Major issues:
>> 
>> The first IANA action is to update
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.txt which
>> requires standard action for adding values.
>> 
> 
> Grrrrrr, my fault, overlooked that the editors put this text in the
> header of the document.
> WG LC was for standards track document.
> 
> Please treat this document as standards track.
> 
>> Minor issues:
>> 
>> The important note in section 6 talks about the values in the examples.
>> I am wondering why not update the document with the correct values after
>> the IANA assignments by the RFC editor.
> 
> Yes, once we have the IANA assigned values we will furnish the RFC-editor with better examples.
> 
> 
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> 
>> 
> thanks for the review
> 
> 	Olafur (document pusher)
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art