Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-dane-ops-12 (re Version 13)

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Elwyn,

I've noted those nits as an RFC editor note for now so
they don't get lost.

Cheers,
S.

On 03/07/15 15:01, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> Hi, Viktor.
> 
> I had a quick look through the new version 13 and it has addressed
> almost all the various nits I identified and looked at the issues I
> mentioned.
> 
> I am not totally convinced about the remaining usage of RFC 2118
> keywords, but I'll leave that for the ADs  to consider.  Barry Leiba (if
> I remember correctly) is particularly exercised about this area - might
> be worth having a word with him.
> 
> There are a couple of nits introduced by the edits (or left over from
> the previous version):
> 
> s3, para 2: s/ When a servers does/When a server does/,
>                    s/SHOULD respond/the server SHOULD respond/
> 
> s10.1, next to last para:  s/as when significantly/as the full
> certificates are significantly/
> 
> s12, bullet 4: s/to processes extended/to  process extended/
> 
> s14, last para: s/PKIX-TA(0(/PKIX-TA(0)/
> 
> Regards,
> Elwyn