Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11
Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org> Wed, 13 July 2011 21:50 UTC
Return-Path: <mccap@petoni.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5246E11E81AF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VfSG1Aaz7Pen for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500C411E81AE for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so8075770fxe.27 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.58.147 with SMTP id g19mr2345349fah.72.1310593847075; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.105.3 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [108.124.75.237]
In-Reply-To: <CAPv4CP-tP-KUja2k2MwMONCibEFir1X_tUkdXEbq5+niR7ytvQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACvMsLHME2eR6brzgiO+ga_XMUMmrDJYCEN5rHzi8uHY_M5KYg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPv4CP-tP-KUja2k2MwMONCibEFir1X_tUkdXEbq5+niR7ytvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:50:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CACvMsLERanQxGkYbysDwZRQd3yFoaLgHDca37_qQ1yXsc2JiHg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org>
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:50:50 -0000
Indeed. My disappointment is not with the draft but with the current state of mobility protocol deployment. And personally, I think I prefer dynamic DNS update. ;) -Pete On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> wrote: > Pete: which protocols would you make mandatory? Personally I prefer > SCTP and/or application-specific quick reconnect :-) (my point being > there's no consensus, alas, but we're letting a hundred flowers bloom) > > Scott > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 13:50, Pete McCann <mccap@petoni.org> wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd >> or AD before posting a new version of the draft. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11 >> Reviewer: Pete McCann >> Review Date: 07-13-2011 >> IETF LC End Date: >> IESG Telechat date: 07-14-2011 >> >> Summary: Ready >> >> Major issues: None >> >> Minor issues: >> >> I am disappointed by the section on Mobility which makes no recommendation on >> mandatory-to-support mobility protocols. However, given the current >> state of things the section as written is reasonable. >> >> Nits/editorial comments: None >> _______________________________________________ >> Gen-art mailing list >> Gen-art@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art >> >