[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-06

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 16 October 2015 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AFC1B32DE for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BrwjO0BCbVfH for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378C51B32CE for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.108]) by resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id Vrzx1r0042LrikM01s1Ngj; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:01:22 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.151]) by resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id Vs1N1r0023Ge9ey01s1NZi; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:01:22 +0000
References: <56211EB8.6060403@alum.mit.edu>
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <56211EB8.6060403@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <56211F52.3040305@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:01:22 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56211EB8.6060403@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1445011282; bh=/T8AvJqITCltq/Ky0RcItUgj4DjWwYgTNXYW32Ksb0k=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=EsMpOe16AU/Jyb/eeIeFkeTyqz4zIVkm1JDR8tNHCv7ihEkzHOadusivBJdnynsCz EB1GObPCAJ9a5fOZhL+xrSHZYOZ3OpctmLIxjWBjO57lfo3fF1vXDpgL+Ez2Wg3Vc1 qwnjHpv5qkbI00/wxzHx6c8PIQTP/lpZN+mr2wJdOGBTeao2Uy/cj73btsOFFgDjqL wcql+3h3eCQMLje8YVEXJUCCjtcgoBNL7LQkJ/Od+n0U3hgEnDM6UdaNESTVirfEos JoA4ICa272/PldDeD7v3p6HaZZBqetdw/ykyLwvViXzgFYoj94q327b8mDJXl+42vH buohy7v6CjB+w==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/QvGjPByj2Qsv1kjgdTHOxiVdF6o>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:01:26 -0000

I forgot to copy gen-art.


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-06
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:58:48 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
To: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits.all@ietf.org

(Unchanged from LC review.)

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document
shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more
information, please see the FAQ at <​
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

This is a well written document. I know nothing about the subject area
but was able to follow the document and understand the points it is making.

Major Issues: NONE

Minor Issues: NONE

Nits: NONE that I noticed.