Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-15

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 04 February 2013 19:01 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E30221F8959 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:01:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pS4BVG0dwwIn for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7508121F894D for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 11:01:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF00F9A4011; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:01:57 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PobOgIbodX3W; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:01:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-96-255-37-162.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.37.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58159A4008; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:01:56 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FD37E36.9080203@isode.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:01:39 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D3D42C39-041A-4DB1-8730-A9A1143A2209@vigilsec.com>
References: <4FD37E36.9080203@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option.all@tools.ietf.org, IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-15
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:01:46 -0000

Alexey:

I have not seen a reply to this review.  Are your concerns resolved in the current version?

Russ

On Jun 9, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-15
> Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
> Review Date: 2012-06-09
> IETF LC End Date: 2012-06-14
> IESG Telechat date: (if known)
> 
> Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> In Section 1: the first reference to URI needs a Normative reference. The whole document is about passing URIs and they are not defined anywhere.
> 
> In Section 2.3: LuriType =1 description says that the value is UTF-8. This is not correct, URIs never contain non-ASCII values. So please either say ASCII, or use IRI if you really meant UTF-8 (but use of IRIs would be horrible, so don't).
> 
> LuriType=2: in network byte order?
> 
> In Section 3.2: "data:" URI needs an Informative reference (RFC 2397).
> 
> In Section 3.3: all media types mentioned (two?) need Normative references.
> 
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> In Section 3, 2nd to the last para: s/deference/dereference ?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art