IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress-01

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 06 April 2020 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E033A0887; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:50:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=TGmMEuLW; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=rOF8iwyj
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gMdMZbXn3by; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 515DC3A0865; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A3F945; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:50:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:50:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=7 RkE7vVEwH0SI5TBZBxBZE6Nuz7K1Y/bXQZTgBsr68k=; b=TGmMEuLWwm2aSJUrN FhXeTKlqa5ScHNyjS1ZoHTZqFpD3JBc7dchOHmA6HyePQSeypTkNYvuggomsbKqr k/Kl18lyq7ZhIIFChNEBKozw8/1cTA3rfGdX2cJN0Ir0sFaFAOdEGd1PXdxAjLAX lhurV9Tcxg/To+pS/hwcDbd9L5a3ZHKbRwWIlLlJuhWQkVykaE18jrRI5F7+BuP5 Yp0899O3rHrV52JvNUrKXJZU8hPr3teFxrYJx/9S4zZ6X+ogYb2n1gBBnq1ElatL p6MW6pH4DEbjejIhJDPjKOT/UV4LLhmtyuT5HBnGqNsz2Z3YxeHkq6R/RaEo20FD ryopg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=7RkE7vVEwH0SI5TBZBxBZE6Nuz7K1Y/bXQZTgBsr6 8k=; b=rOF8iwyjTxvYBpUPHO7klPbEu8KjFg3+wcanckQXx/6bQfCZ94xqEEmxU hnbehwvydomUoU2B/3YBu9kQWM++s8jXsZhMybm75r91q9th4NXMzXpWKzfb6Cha KJMMkSAsyrHIx5XKzR0ey0bIFDeujer16AF5mKQ7rwJexuWmhFmoKXkJSZCr2ce0 0kFXhoUgodQUjL43qeuRpoBp5qLni63+QlA56rrUF+6oYJ1i8H7xBVp98bduJJ2L m2nLn81I6vNmsLAHn8Coc5v0UdLr2jcEGuSXlGclVkBhiYmslhSZn+REk8xoP/Mf dYDvcnwa4KaysvClidMzS7xO3vFTQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:112LXil0jtIzE6zr9KMmzB9R7gu9BPjCSTLX6ufZyQWco7sY8EzFeA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudefgdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepuddtkedrhedurddutddurdelkeenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghooh hpvghrfidrihhn
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:112LXuFA9ef07zGrdN0GAal6zomqy0qJ3WDkA5mFIfMYDluJoR6g7g> <xmx:112LXrqyzcqFCWnc-VJG0SUs2EGUt6T8n6UPYcUMWVXhpOdDwhEqtA> <xmx:112LXq4-n0YnbkFTtkSdzLEmQ4Sz8PgoMVlA4TqpfBhiRcflwWOtcw> <xmx:112LXm0gGIFDHYv7bNX4SzodmKESVuVPcSQPnSSX9gvqk9tdw7hAWg>
Received: from alcoop-m-c46z.fios-router.home (pool-108-51-101-98.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.101.98]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 670A63280067; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:50:31 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <158411258778.3418.757369789772046254@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:50:30 -0400
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, sidrops@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <000C921B-6DE3-4E59-B349-B013F3798C7F@cooperw.in>
References: <158411258778.3418.757369789772046254@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/RkVuTaORYj0olhO20duzptOcMm0>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 16:50:43 -0000

Robert, thanks for your review. All, thanks for your responses and text updates. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Mar 13, 2020, at 11:16 AM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-sidrops-ov-egress-01
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review Date: 2020-03-13
> IETF LC End Date: 2020-03-18
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: Ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC
> 
> Very minor nit - feel free to ignore -
> 
> This sentence slowed me down when reading:
> 
>   As the origin AS may be modified by outbound policy, policy semantics
>   based on RPKI Origin Validation state MUST be able to be applied
>   separately on distribution into BGP and on egress.
> 
> I suggest something like:
> 
>  As the origin AS may be modified by outbound policy, a BGP speaker 
>  MUST be able to apply policy semantics based on RPKI Origin Validation 
>  state separately on distribution into BGP and on egress.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email