Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-simple-chat-13.txt

[Gonzalo Camarillo <[e-mail]>]

Hi Suresh,

thanks for your review. The authors will take care of these comments in
the next revision of the draft.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 20/02/2012 5:02 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
> draft-ietf-simple-chat-13.txt
> 
> For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
> <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but
> I have a few comments.
> 
> Section 3:
> 
> REQ-3: It is unclear why this is separate from REQ-2. In my reading,
> REQ-2 already covers REQ-3.
> 
> Section 6.1
> 
> This sentence is not clear. Can you clarify/reword.
> 
> "Having the header of the Message/CPIM wrapper only in the first chunk,
> the MSRP switch MUST track the Message-Id until the last chunk of the
> message has been distributed."
> 
> Thanks
> Suresh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>