[Gen-art] (full) review of draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis

[Francis Dupont <[e-mail]>]

This completes the review I sent last week.

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-17.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20180911
IESG Telechat date: 20180927

Summary: Ready with Nits

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - 3 pages 4-8: some abbrevs are used before being defined *. I don't know
  a good way to fix this and anyway there are only a few  specific terms
  so IMHO it is not a real problem.
  * e.g. ETR is used the entry before its definition.

 - 5.1 page 16: the I bit text is not very clear IMHO both because
  the Instance ID is not defined before section 8 and because L and I
  bits interfere. As the problem comes from RFC 6830 I propose to keep
  the current text.

 - 10.1 pages 26 and 27: the order between nonce word and derivations
  from echo is not very consistent. If you have another reason to revisit
  the section please fix this very minor issue.

 - B.3 page 40: implementators -> implementors

 - 8.12 page 42: addreses -> addresses

 - B.13 page 43: Reencapsulating -> Re-encapsulating
  (BTW these spelling errors are in text which should be dropped :-)

 - as it is a RFC revision perhaps it should be fine to add some words
  about real world deployments of LISP?

Regards

[e-mail]