IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-attribute-bnf-02

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Tue, 18 October 2011 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F5721F899D for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j66ZKXAuoVXe for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:35:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA1921F8997 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p9INZpHZ023996 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:35:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p9INZoMA027651 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:35:51 -0500
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com ([135.244.18.105]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id p9INZnBq010884; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:35:50 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4E9E0DFF.206@bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:38:39 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0) Gecko/20110927 Thunderbird/7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
References: <4E9C9BA2.1040801@bell-labs.com> <4E9DF5FD.9060407@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E9DF5FD.9060407@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ccamp-attribute-bnf@tools.ietf.org, dbrungard@att.com
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-attribute-bnf-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:35:54 -0000

On 10/18/2011 04:56 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> These are both in text quoted from RFC5420, so the comment applies
> to that RFC.  Clearly we can't change it in this document.

Lou: Sure, that is understandable.

> (BTW usage of 'must' as in the English/informative usage is still
> legitimate.)

Indeed, however, the lower-case 'must' appeared in a cluster
containing other upper case (and normative) language, so I
just wanted to point it out in case this was an oversight.

> good catch!  it should be:
> s/LSP Attribute/LSP Attributes
[...]
> another good catch:
> s/LSP attributed/LSP Attributes
> Much thanks!

No problem.  Thank you for attending to my comments!

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email