IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10

Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net> Mon, 09 May 2016 12:25 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AD512D189 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 05:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4I5ids2fBJmH for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 05:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0142.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA1712D173 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2016 05:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=TMzTxwSKFMOJUJc+BbY3+OP7B2jxhsxUFUJHSUiJcts=; b=McZZ/EEO5eJZskzl6YV9XbCNERUmTBmVx6LKeNyAitMw0/3aOPO6dgn2Dqgz0x9HSwKFtxjFTjDRWY0AqCQOQGKOXbv/daxn0h4tX/KFXvEFa/rD04jLe6ocq/VrSA1ODvTpTCQP17BQjnITg+juC7Oi+0pJzx+AqWKbwHJOum8=
Received: from BN3PR05MB2707.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.2.136) by BN3PR05MB2708.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.2.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.492.11; Mon, 9 May 2016 12:25:07 +0000
Received: from BN3PR05MB2707.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.2.136]) by BN3PR05MB2707.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.2.136]) with mapi id 15.01.0492.014; Mon, 9 May 2016 12:25:07 +0000
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "jefftant.ietf@gmail.com" <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10
Thread-Index: AdGo/U3+4AL82e7jR2aWFbDCuohAPgA8HFaA
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 12:25:07 +0000
Message-ID: <BN3PR05MB2707A3FD70BF916593B7F1D8B5700@BN3PR05MB2707.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751DC222@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA751DC222@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: avaya.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;avaya.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5438c89a-a9cd-4987-368d-08d37804f52c
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR05MB2708; 5:5AjGD+hhD3tROlC5oAcTiyC368oLoe6DV3Ai09XlAO+BHEY+1dpdqaqJJfMx6frvgUFLKz286qLz/RTYsFt0CsOu/RgTuJtsCNWC0BcVCqyagOfF8yJX+zzKvRB+doeFpeQVXbYGN127NqAxB2XCpQ==; 24:t7S5BZUH5ORAVv5lbvDGASpgC9MrdjJuGW5tncfd8Fl22hX8JMdG4uwt/FRw1b+gzYQhSNdulOT1WgQvFKGDf8l8xEushhRrRvXwqPRf9wI=; 7:4zgSOePK3dLTxGbCLo/De283oVq+0LQqW6kT5mqwA+WUGyvu0TlgH5cstXS2HuzM9XRHWU52ANbXNTalhxKsubXIi24bkZFwnh/UX66bEfcPdLBJk7us9DDqO65E09LDaKeAYVec98gv/hRuK5Ggj0sWisRXq8nGUmk8Pju4iBHM8B0rpqRVjdPIOFAMlkAN
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR05MB2708;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR05MB270825053CD2026E851D4021B5700@BN3PR05MB2708.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(138986009662008);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:BN3PR05MB2708; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR05MB2708;
x-forefront-prvs: 0937FB07C5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(9170700001)(586003)(5002640100001)(9686002)(10400500002)(4326007)(5003600100002)(102836003)(11100500001)(6116002)(3846002)(99286002)(19625215002)(5008740100001)(15975445007)(230783001)(81166005)(8936002)(5004730100002)(76576001)(2501003)(2900100001)(1220700001)(2950100001)(9326002)(77096005)(790700001)(86362001)(66066001)(19580405001)(19609705001)(19300405004)(2906002)(87936001)(189998001)(3660700001)(5001770100001)(16236675004)(19580395003)(76176999)(50986999)(74316001)(92566002)(3280700002)(54356999)(33656002)(122556002)(7059030); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR05MB2708; H:BN3PR05MB2707.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN3PR05MB2707A3FD70BF916593B7F1D8B5700BN3PR05MB2707namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 May 2016 12:25:07.6952 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR05MB2708
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/V2Ad9ltEVINsFO08G758eKkG21E>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 12:25:24 -0000

Hi Dan,

No - I was just optimistic about getting it into IETF Last Call in time for the 5/19 call.
As it turns out, that's not happening and I will be moving it out.

Regards,
Alia

From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 4:00 AM
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>; jefftant.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10

Alia, Jeff,

I am the designed Gen-ART reviewer of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc-10. I notice that this is a RTGWG document and is on the agenda of the telechat on 5/19, but no IETF Last Call was conducted. Can you shortly explain the reasons? Did you intentionally decide to skip IETF LC, or is this an omission? Another question - this document has a strong operational topic - did it go through an OPS-DIR review?

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email